d5/16d7b03ba85ec37c79a840a1c4fc1d0e917e5f

   1 Return-Path: <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5  by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09F766DE0355\r
   6  for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:19:35 -0700 (PDT)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -0.259\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.259 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.311,\r
  12   DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
  13  FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7,\r
  14  RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001]\r
  15  autolearn=disabled\r
  16 Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  17  by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  18  with ESMTP id 1U1oytyDsIJr for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  19  Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:19:27 -0700 (PDT)\r
  20 Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com (mail-wm0-f68.google.com\r
  21  [74.125.82.68]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0D6D6DE0352 for\r
  22  <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:19:26 -0700 (PDT)\r
  23 Received: by mail-wm0-f68.google.com with SMTP id l6so19047097wml.3\r
  24  for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:19:26 -0700 (PDT)\r
  25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
  26  h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id\r
  27  :mime-version; bh=TkE0nN9o9HX00hEHs+OCpwd3CFwNcF/fKvSE9NGPzyE=;\r
  28  b=zjcwd8PL/9Ls3XlsgpEooIUbNt/vAEh4Sa4nailUM0Pvj3fjfU9dqPMXscNmYfmR+e\r
  29  nAX9tYsz93aWFbZC58HRpIYUKAtXyFIM1to3uHwZ+z5SkBFe9wi2cn+f4IoYeWR14UDZ\r
  30  tyPlKSu5w64nPDuI7yC71dyt9hrNmnIUCx6vJ4MfV0IeKEjY4NDQOg1YQy7t4IYxcaQB\r
  31  kvOa4jiZyQsoWp7S4myhCPJTZFn+0aQhSvywG5NlSV5X6MFfpPLRazbt8Mxn7/EnjBdT\r
  32  yMK41Ahn6lElp3aIFN60S6DXfRIAdqfHSxQcauqBllKnTUjoL16aEXRYT0zVpLwX0/5x\r
  33  RoAg==\r
  34 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
  35  d=1e100.net; s=20130820;\r
  36  h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references\r
  37  :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version;\r
  38  bh=TkE0nN9o9HX00hEHs+OCpwd3CFwNcF/fKvSE9NGPzyE=;\r
  39  b=OLZyoFYanmCaHe9BO5FTQ4njEVt54+Qi/2R3hdvGlWlwsTJ+PpBbYOOwthSe2aste8\r
  40  M2IaL4xGaNMzwEENeL0qdpF+d6MDD8i3mZf6OQJcrxNNPDZb8rITxNVeitXowZtHMRcW\r
  41  6DtvlFwab/mJwF0zC8JZOGNsdaYq1LdV0spr2E180WmF3l9BLw4QFB9B0XIDX6c154ft\r
  42  xpSTJKdhiXdD5BefuCsgVZCblk5SghJzbcYYZ+yGhydJdUn2PDFsPYc6pixPFr8l3Xe8\r
  43  S0immO3kjWty9u2Zee/1cgsS+sdgGMsB9fXLXfDdKowVUcCNJLbKFS5ET85Diw8G6RoH\r
  44  sy9g==\r
  45 X-Gm-Message-State:\r
  46  AD7BkJKAMoJwbGwvzLOfhCqfN8eSzXFwiCNPbikPq4ozQ6b6bzQvRPzbnmaVIfacw5BmHA==\r
  47 X-Received: by 10.194.3.45 with SMTP id 13mr22149953wjz.145.1460359165022;\r
  48  Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:19:25 -0700 (PDT)\r
  49 Received: from localhost ([92.54.140.178])\r
  50  by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 7sm15795041wmn.7.2016.04.11.00.19.24\r
  51  (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);\r
  52  Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:19:24 -0700 (PDT)\r
  53 From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
  54 To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>,\r
  55  Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>,\r
  56  David Mazieres expires 2016-07-03 PDT\r
  57  <mazieres-297ctmng4fhr6h6ad8yffa64yi@temporary-address.scs.stanford.edu>,\r
  58  notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  59 Subject: Re: Breaking a really long thread\r
  60 In-Reply-To: <87oa9g7vd6.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
  61 References: <c10e501c2baee471cbeeb42aad89a1e966407234-NM@bruno.deptj.eu>\r
  62  <87k2kd8r6d.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> <87wpoc7hf8.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu>\r
  63  <8760vrm3jk.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> <87fuuu3938.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
  64  <87bn5ijthh.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> <87oa9g7vd6.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
  65 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+17~g6d0b613 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1\r
  66  (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
  67 Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 08:19:23 +0100\r
  68 Message-ID: <87y48kipdw.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
  69 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  70 Content-Type: text/plain\r
  71 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  72 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20\r
  73 Precedence: list\r
  74 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  75  <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  76 List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  77  <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  78 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
  79 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  80 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  81 List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  82  <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  83 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 07:19:35 -0000\r
  84 \r
  85 \r
  86 On Mon, 11 Apr 2016, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
  87 > Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> writes:\r
  88 >\r
  89 >> I think we already have this, except it is called\r
  90 >> notmuch-mua-hidden-headers. It defaults to '("^User-Agent:").\r
  91 >>\r
  92 >> I think it would be reasonable to add In-Reply-To to this list.\r
  93 >>\r
  94 >> However, if I read the code correctly, currently we are changing\r
  95 >> message-hidden-headers globally which doesn't feel the right thing to\r
  96 >> do. Probably we should do something more like you suggest, and do the\r
  97 >> overriding just in notmuch-message-mode.\r
  98 >>\r
  99 >\r
 100 > Summarizing, I see 3 related changes here\r
 101 >\r
 102 > - fixing the code to let-bind message-hidden-headers instead of globally\r
 103 >   modify it\r
 104 \r
 105 I have a patch doing this, but there is one problem that i don't see how\r
 106 to solve neatly. At the moment we set hidden-headers to the union of\r
 107 message-hidden-headers and notmuch-mua-hidden-headers. This means that\r
 108 if the user wants to show a header that is normally one of\r
 109 message-hidden-headers they have to set message-hidden-headers (ie they\r
 110 can't just change notmuch-mua-hidden headers).\r
 111 \r
 112 If we want it that people can show such a header just by changing a\r
 113 notmuch variable then I don't see how to do it neatly without breaking\r
 114 some existing setups.\r
 115 \r
 116 Any suggestions?\r
 117 \r
 118 Best wishes\r
 119 \r
 120 Mark\r
 121 \r
 122 >\r
 123 > - adding in-reply-to notmuch-mua\r
 124 >\r
 125 > - providing a keybinding to toggle visibility of hidden headers that\r
 126 >   works better than the current use of widen\r
 127 >\r
 128 > d\r