1 Return-Path: <awg@xvx.ca>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B050431FB6
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 5 May 2012 11:55:22 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id VbMPNwQmqkKZ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Sat, 5 May 2012 11:55:21 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com (mail-lb0-f181.google.com
\r
18 [209.85.217.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54090431FAE
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 5 May 2012 11:55:21 -0700 (PDT)
\r
22 Received: by lbbgk8 with SMTP id gk8so2986987lbb.26
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 05 May 2012 11:55:18 -0700 (PDT)
\r
24 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
\r
25 d=google.com; s=20120113;
\r
26 h=mime-version:sender:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date
\r
27 :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
\r
28 :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state;
\r
29 bh=chyXCfoszrb8gFk702EP4DGqGPEPsDHPEunu3J/Vmus=;
\r
30 b=T/VB3dIW6rrArHMgBuxgeMExVitrVqtrvuuxL3+WT66i2bGclikrXNpJl082tjuux1
\r
31 4WyqS2yC/snd9pH1uUEQ6eXD1ciqMa3TGl+sVkVPkmzEBV5pRCa/CZnO1m5ES0UJgrlO
\r
32 iWShHP2YOGOFUsOMaELozOW2lVq+cq8eXa1DL/VBnQnXPB+NdSac+lAg1xngZVi/KHfr
\r
33 +mLccTc3f3pNX3sjSnxPeeTLuaJJ/dJzX6yjah86OmTURsXOT2kw4ktTjSo5wooECYpO
\r
34 wej6BvCImtuzfUEnQmJu0Kc89CQiPeNZgcL9NDsyohWOKPw+ExtvuWYoFYmQW3T7IDdq
\r
37 Received: by 10.112.29.99 with SMTP id j3mr4833947lbh.47.1336244118227; Sat,
\r
38 05 May 2012 11:55:18 -0700 (PDT)
\r
40 Received: by 10.112.82.163 with HTTP; Sat, 5 May 2012 11:55:18 -0700 (PDT)
\r
41 X-Originating-IP: [96.52.216.56]
\r
42 In-Reply-To: <87r4uzailm.fsf@awakening.csail.mit.edu>
\r
43 References: <1335056093-17621-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>
\r
44 <1335056093-17621-2-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>
\r
45 <87r4uzailm.fsf@awakening.csail.mit.edu>
\r
46 Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 12:55:18 -0600
\r
47 X-Google-Sender-Auth: JVherbqOMPcCmQ-LJNEiAvBnDOs
\r
49 <CAMoJFUuzUkz-8XPBntT8Jd3K6RHgHrdkK-ZZ4+LD1hw6To3vCw@mail.gmail.com>
\r
50 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] test: Replying to an HTML-only message in emacs
\r
51 From: Adam Wolfe Gordon <awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>
\r
52 To: Austin Clements <amdragon@mit.edu>
\r
53 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
\r
54 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
56 ALoCoQnlJaHVc0ZlAt+Xo8JchOdwqDBPcRnE1BsCFhskwXcVHuTL+c4DxYVD+gQXkuREhn1USz5O
\r
57 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
58 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
59 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
61 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
62 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
63 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
64 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
65 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
66 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
67 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
68 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
69 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
70 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 18:55:22 -0000
\r
72 On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Austin Clements <amdragon@mit.edu> wrote:
\r
73 > Does the test output depend on the HTML renderer used? =A0(And should
\r
74 > there be a test dependency on w3m or something? =A0I must admit, I don't
\r
75 > know how mm's HTML rendering works.)
\r
77 That's a good question. HTML output does depend on what renderer is
\r
78 used, but I think the test message is simple enough that they'll all
\r
79 produce the same output. I believe mm prefers w3m.el, and falls back
\r
80 to using an external w3m binary, and then emacs's built-in HTML
\r
81 parsing (I'm significantly less sure whether the last part is true).
\r
83 I've tried removing w3m and w3m.el from my system, and the test still
\r
84 passes, so I think we're OK.
\r