1 Return-Path: <pieter@praet.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C825A429E26
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:08:03 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id o7rOh7Iqir6c for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:08:00 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com
\r
18 [209.85.212.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CD7F431FB6
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:07:59 -0800 (PST)
\r
22 Received: by wibhr12 with SMTP id hr12so1498430wib.26
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:07:58 -0800 (PST)
\r
24 Received: by 10.180.106.165 with SMTP id gv5mr7582848wib.18.1326388078860;
\r
25 Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:07:58 -0800 (PST)
\r
26 Received: from localhost ([109.131.126.209])
\r
27 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q7sm915386wix.5.2012.01.12.09.07.57
\r
28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
\r
29 Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:07:58 -0800 (PST)
\r
30 From: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>
\r
31 To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>
\r
32 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] NEWS: fix some old typos and trailing whitespace
\r
34 <CAB+hUn9Ysf9KGVCFAas2JfH+CZ0yFC47oWZHBdRT9u=i21TkZg@mail.gmail.com>
\r
35 References: <87zkfwn4lm.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
36 <1321475870-29674-1-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org>
\r
37 <1321475870-29674-3-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org>
\r
38 <yf662ijss8k.fsf@taco2.nixu.fi> <87d3crd9yr.fsf@praet.org>
\r
39 <CAB+hUn9Ysf9KGVCFAas2JfH+CZ0yFC47oWZHBdRT9u=i21TkZg@mail.gmail.com>
\r
40 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+115~gadd29f6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
41 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
\r
42 Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:06:14 +0100
\r
43 Message-ID: <87obu8luk9.fsf@praet.org>
\r
45 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
46 Cc: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>, Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
47 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
48 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
50 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
51 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
52 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
53 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
54 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
55 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
56 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
57 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
58 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
59 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:08:03 -0000
\r
61 On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:21:59 +0200, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:
\r
62 > On Nov 16, 2011 11:39 PM, "Pieter Praet" <pieter@praet.org> wrote:
\r
64 > > On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:54:35 +0200, Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
\r
66 > > > On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 21:37:50 +0100, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>
\r
68 > > > > No further explanation needed.
\r
70 > > > > NEWS | 14 +++++++-------
\r
71 > > > > 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
\r
73 > > > The 'No further explanation needed.' should be *BELOW* the waistline
\r
75 > > > now it goes to the commit message which is probably not what anybody
\r
79 > > That was intended :)
\r
81 > > Empty commit messages are frowned upon (even if the commit subject is
\r
82 > > sufficiently descriptive), so "rather a pointless one than none?" :)
\r
84 > Generally I think the message should be self-contained and understandable
\r
85 > without the subject line, so IMHO a full meaningful sentence is better than
\r
86 > one/none, even if it's repetition.
\r
91 That would indeed have been the most sensible thing to do.
\r
93 Could someone (who -unlike me- has already submitted his/her public SSH
\r
94 key for commit access) add something along those lines to the Patch
\r
95 Formatting guidelines [1] ? Perhaps just quote Carl's statement [2] ?
\r
103 [1] http://notmuchmail.org/patchformatting/
\r
104 [2] id:"87ocmwok2w.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org"
\r