1 Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E5C5431FBC
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 02:30:48 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id 8xBzQmuTLf2P for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Tue, 4 Feb 2014 02:30:40 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D17B431FAF
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 02:30:40 -0800 (PST)
\r
20 Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1])
\r
21 by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E55B100033;
\r
22 Tue, 4 Feb 2014 12:30:31 +0200 (EET)
\r
23 From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
\r
24 To: "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us>
\r
25 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] nmbug-status: Python-3-compabitility and general
\r
27 In-Reply-To: <20140204005331.GQ14197@odin.tremily.us>
\r
28 References: <cover.1391424512.git.wking@tremily.us>
\r
29 <m2ha8frjgg.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
30 <20140204005331.GQ14197@odin.tremily.us>
\r
31 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+55~g4397960 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1
\r
32 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
\r
33 X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL
\r
34 $[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F
\r
35 !)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z
\r
36 Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 12:30:30 +0200
\r
37 Message-ID: <m2fvnzp3uh.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
39 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
\r
40 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
41 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
42 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
43 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
45 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
46 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
47 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
48 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
49 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
50 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
51 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
52 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
53 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
54 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 10:30:48 -0000
\r
56 On Tue, Feb 04 2014, "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> wrote:
\r
58 > On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 11:10:23PM +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
\r
59 >> data['message-id-term'] =3D 'id:"{}"'.format(value)
\r
60 >> ValueError: zero length field name in format
\r
62 > Oops, Python 2.6 still needs explicit indexes ('{0}', not '{}'). It's
\r
63 > an easy fix, so I'll queue it for v2. You're still going to need
\r
64 > Python 2.7 or greater for collections.OrderedDict(). We could word
\r
65 > around that too, but do we really care about 2.6? I don't expect that
\r
66 > the installed nmbug-status userbase is so large and backward that
\r
67 > upgrading to 2.7 will be that hard ;). 2.6 isn't even getting
\r
68 > security fixes anymore [1], so I think it's time to migrate :p.
\r
70 Probably not many cares about 2.6; I already use argparse and I can add
\r
71 that OrderedDict() too. Still {0} is easy enough to do :D. I am running
\r
72 this notmuch & nmbug in Scientific Linux 6.2 machine which has python 2.6
\r
73 -- and this is the only machine where I can review your nmbug-status
\r
76 >> File "devel/nmbug/nmbug-status", line 197, in _write_threads
\r
77 >> ).format(**message_display_data))
\r
78 >> File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/codecs.py", line 351, in write
\r
79 >> data, consumed =3D self.encode(object, self.errors)
\r
80 >> UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode character u'\u017b' in
\r
81 >> position 176: ordinal not in range(128)
\r
83 > Hmm. __future__'s unicode_literals should be giving us a Unicode
\r
84 > target, so I'm not sure why we'd have trouble injecting Unicode. This
\r
85 > works fine for me on Python 2.7 and 3.3. Maybe you just have a funky
\r
86 > encoding? What is your:
\r
89 > LANG=3Den_US.UTF-8
\r
91 > $ python -c 'import locale, sys; print(locale.getpreferredencoding() or=
\r
92 sys.getdefaultencoding())'
\r
96 all other LC_* variables en_US.UTF-8 except
\r
97 LC_TIME=3Den_GB.utf8
\r
98 LC_ALL empty (naturally)
\r
100 python -c 'import locale; print(locale.getpreferredencoding())'
\r
102 python -c 'import sys; print(sys.getdefaultencoding())'
\r
106 anyway, if this doesn't resolve out and there is no resistance to require
\r
107 python 2.7 (that means from David) I can hack around this to get this
\r
117 > [1]: http://www.python.org/download/releases/2.6.9/
\r