1 Return-Path: <novalazy@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DBC3431FBC
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 04:23:49 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id GYLhI74HNr-n for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Thu, 13 Dec 2012 04:23:47 -0800 (PST)
\r
18 Received: from mail-da0-f53.google.com (mail-da0-f53.google.com
\r
19 [209.85.210.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1AFD431FB6
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 04:23:47 -0800 (PST)
\r
23 Received: by mail-da0-f53.google.com with SMTP id x6so750820dac.26
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 04:23:47 -0800 (PST)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
\r
26 h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references
\r
27 :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition
\r
28 :content-transfer-encoding;
\r
29 bh=aGinfDdw8dqD4yft3/7fAMfmdcZyZ9bGQcK5m61+JCg=;
\r
30 b=uhbuPFQifbKfMdP6KLuFeSmZ2PIT/lf0KzQGCCOovP29LjD0GhUNjkclbkpA/ByPfo
\r
31 SzRfBDfNhuX0OT7x21ceICWI8/3aT3Lheoi2q11kxdAb8MK2k8QjQss4BkFMqyCpWFne
\r
32 9K/3ZyXafWm1SppRzJhucpbPnxteSVEay2M4lNHsYeYZAvk7W9Dbnow28kqGrXiUM7II
\r
33 2e0+C/qQ12Ds0shennsEqZuzpckkcETqSI/xn0LGibDDwHVRTy/IjZhIcE72e4rzh+Xk
\r
34 ugUQ1p8u4TN5QPu19Bi4o5oysFRvTsvkr5/iT/l9Uge31CJL12AybrygHOIQJeCFVka4
\r
36 Received: by 10.68.190.227 with SMTP id gt3mr5165661pbc.5.1355401425942;
\r
37 Thu, 13 Dec 2012 04:23:45 -0800 (PST)
\r
38 Received: from localhost (215.42.233.220.static.exetel.com.au.
\r
40 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id qh4sm965002pbb.9.2012.12.13.04.23.40
\r
41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
\r
42 Thu, 13 Dec 2012 04:23:42 -0800 (PST)
\r
43 Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 23:23:36 +1100
\r
44 Message-ID: <20121213232336.GA21848@hili.localdomain>
\r
45 From: Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com>
\r
46 To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>
\r
47 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] indicate length of omitted body content
\r
48 In-Reply-To: <87vccb2frl.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
49 References: <1355057796-19260-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com>
\r
50 <87vccb2frl.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
52 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
\r
53 Content-Disposition: inline
\r
54 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
\r
55 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
56 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
57 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
59 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
60 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
61 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
62 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
63 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
64 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
65 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
66 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
67 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
68 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:23:49 -0000
\r
70 On Sun, 09 Dec 2012 19:21:18 +0000, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:
\r
72 > Hi (sorry Peter I had assumed git send-email would have cc'd you on my
\r
73 > rebase earlier today)
\r
75 > There was some discussion about this patch series on irc and the general
\r
76 > view was favourable but that, for consistency, all omitted parts should
\r
77 > received a content-length (including text/html). This is a little messy
\r
78 > to code into the if else stuff: Jani suggested putting
\r
79 > content-length/content-encoding into a small function.
\r
81 > Anyway I had hope it was just a trivial rebase and could go in, but the
\r
82 > above will take a bit longer to do neatly so I will leave it for now.
\r
84 Ok. To save any potential duplicated work: I've updated the patch here,
\r
85 save for test/sexp. Waiting for that to be pushed before updating it.
\r