1 Return-Path: <pieter@praet.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D69429E43
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 03:34:49 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id i00+LOl-jJ3v for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Mon, 16 Jan 2012 03:34:48 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com
\r
18 [74.125.82.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34515429E40
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 03:34:48 -0800 (PST)
\r
22 Received: by werh12 with SMTP id h12so1347871wer.26
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 03:34:47 -0800 (PST)
\r
24 Received: by 10.216.140.223 with SMTP id e73mr663991wej.54.1326713687027;
\r
25 Mon, 16 Jan 2012 03:34:47 -0800 (PST)
\r
26 Received: from localhost ([109.131.75.86])
\r
27 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fy5sm33466602wib.7.2012.01.16.03.34.46
\r
28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
\r
29 Mon, 16 Jan 2012 03:34:46 -0800 (PST)
\r
30 From: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>
\r
31 To: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>
\r
32 Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] emacs: merge overhauled
\r
33 `notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers' into `notmuch'
\r
34 In-Reply-To: <87wr8rc2ex.fsf@praet.org>
\r
35 References: <cunpqek597g.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
\r
36 <1326710551-23122-1-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org>
\r
37 <cunvcob52ku.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
\r
38 <87wr8rc2ex.fsf@praet.org>
\r
39 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+78~g6c58370 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
40 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
\r
41 Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:32:58 +0100
\r
42 Message-ID: <87ty3vc26t.fsf@praet.org>
\r
44 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
45 Cc: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
46 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
47 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
49 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
50 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
51 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
52 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
53 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
54 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
55 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
56 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
57 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
58 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:34:49 -0000
\r
60 On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:28:06 +0100, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org> wrote:
\r
61 > On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:06:25 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:
\r
62 > > On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:42:31 +0100, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org> wrote:
\r
63 > > > CLisp'ier version of `notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers', merged into `notmuch',
\r
64 > > > eliminating the need to hog yet another keybind.
\r
66 > > The lisp-ier-ness changes are good.
\r
68 > > I'm less sure about the functional change. Sometimes I want to go back
\r
69 > > to where I was, other times I want to go to `notmuch-hello'. [...]
\r
71 > Hmmm, true. The path of least resistance is elusive.
\r
74 > > that I can replace my binding for `notmuch' with one for
\r
75 > > `notmuch-hello'.
\r
78 > Perhaps we could use `ido-completion-help', like Org-mode does with
\r
79 > `org-iswitchb' ? OTOH, that would require an extra [RET]. Bah...
\r
82 s/ido-completion-help/ido-completing-read
\r
84 > > Hmm, yes, that seems reasonable.
\r
86 > > > FYI: causes 2 compile warnings due to requiring the cl package at runtime.
\r
88 > > `cl' is still `eval-when-compile' though - won't that break?
\r
90 > Haven't noticed any issues here, apart from the complaints @ compilation.
\r