1 Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34B036DE176B
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 06:37:52 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.147 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[AWL=-0.080, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
\r
13 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01,
\r
14 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
\r
16 Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
17 by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
18 with ESMTP id Bhy2Dv5G1Fkt for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
19 Sat, 12 Mar 2016 06:37:49 -0800 (PST)
\r
20 Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com (mail-wm0-f51.google.com
\r
21 [74.125.82.51]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 269806DE01CA for
\r
22 <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 06:37:49 -0800 (PST)
\r
23 Received: by mail-wm0-f51.google.com with SMTP id n186so53503903wmn.1
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 06:37:49 -0800 (PST)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
\r
26 d=dme-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
\r
27 h=to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
\r
28 :mime-version; bh=G/lpmI7SZ5s8WmrcG7Itf0Y9m0+71eJ6FGN3C9DClMw=;
\r
29 b=AyQFWYwaX9kINa+iHbfH1z0i/xQ20eOIqHkJluKYhWh4JQLCnftAqg9FXfcrlJaJTg
\r
30 7m8Tmj5zhgxrCuAaGHPGn1oYJjd4N+3w3AhoK9L7H840DS7c8n+aT1lnBlqiyTabXYdh
\r
31 XzI7rqh6Al7TYp/B/3PNE/i85z92bTUzEyLC6P8m/EGKT+hb7T6dtkqsdl953b1BtWw1
\r
32 UcqyU4fEh+Q1lG48aKQEsFIhblm9PMN1bT2qRADmJRia0WXBBfOmL5XvLFKxZ8JE/hyi
\r
33 lOuQI1k3vVectBqrkhGTmImHVZ3y/J+A28MXP7AYzM/sEcdCjaD8Yg5ABIhrlk7WYf73
\r
35 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
\r
36 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
\r
37 h=x-gm-message-state:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:from:date
\r
38 :message-id:mime-version;
\r
39 bh=G/lpmI7SZ5s8WmrcG7Itf0Y9m0+71eJ6FGN3C9DClMw=;
\r
40 b=H+L8fgXpMfiECXP8Lt+WSBanQjTVgmje+kJcVWQA6FSQ6JrNEceMP6WQGLQmSTj9BC
\r
41 UaajnvMoXaHrhT+hJmiNS8Xw4D/rCGAJqcL+ulcKXhwGiAxz0V5cSfyLkNSU5nq9aXAQ
\r
42 abp+Pq5z+UC9EN2ZHdyi93d0jVKWSjQ75fOgP6PeRewBbo4qCjQ6HFMUUakB2xxK/Yv2
\r
43 33TbVXll25ptzZVDuUROqaV0ADchxZHLvNIS58KnEz4TDm0BKABXgEzKsSgW/a6HlJf9
\r
44 Ik53YPT390ja7hTbkVR2LmRPMhx0weF9dwI3ofDIIG1icaB+roWiuoEj094Ba7Q5iVZ+
\r
47 AD7BkJKerSpm987HPhMPWU8lQurh9iYtSgAoQh7wnYWFLIDjZXPYfWNrJ1J08cd4rzMlzA==
\r
48 X-Received: by 10.194.77.193 with SMTP id u1mr15114796wjw.73.1457793467148;
\r
49 Sat, 12 Mar 2016 06:37:47 -0800 (PST)
\r
50 Received: from disaster-area.hh.sledj.net
\r
51 ([2a01:348:1a2:1:ea39:35ff:fe2c:a227])
\r
52 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id av3sm13432639wjc.44.2016.03.12.06.37.45
\r
53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
\r
54 Sat, 12 Mar 2016 06:37:45 -0800 (PST)
\r
55 Received: from localhost (disaster-area.hh.sledj.net [local])
\r
56 by disaster-area.hh.sledj.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 09dcda85;
\r
57 Sat, 12 Mar 2016 14:37:44 +0000 (UTC)
\r
58 To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>,
\r
59 Matthew Lear <matt@bubblegen.co.uk>
\r
60 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
61 Subject: Re: (emacs) Parsing problems replying to encrypted html
\r
62 In-Reply-To: <87wpp76ctq.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
63 References: <f50e07855e9bbbdd780ef925d8e2d879.squirrel@webmail.plus.net>
\r
64 <m2a8miwc6x.fsf@dme.org>
\r
65 <c4ff9f2c141441be10b1cb4b1e0300a7.squirrel@webmail.plus.net>
\r
66 <56DD48B3.90604@bubblegen.co.uk> <87mvqatr6y.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
67 <87h9gigfyz.fsf@bubblegen.co.uk> <87pov58b9y.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
68 <m260wxkvf3.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi> <87wpp76ctq.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
69 From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
\r
70 Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 14:37:44 +0000
\r
71 Message-ID: <m2shzvrccn.fsf@dme.org>
\r
73 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
74 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
75 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
\r
77 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
78 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
79 List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
80 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
81 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>
\r
82 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
83 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
84 List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
85 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
86 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 14:37:52 -0000
\r
88 On Sat, Mar 12 2016, David Bremner wrote:
\r
89 > Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> writes:
\r
91 >> 2016-03-08 (Tue) 14:16:01: reply --format=sexp --format-version=1 --reply-to=sender thread:0000000000004a6f
\r
92 >> 2016-03-08 (Tue) 14:16:01: show --format=raw --part=2 id:56DDE706.6060702@bubblegen.co.uk
\r
93 >> 2016-03-08 (Tue) 14:16:01: show --format=sexp --include-html --part=3 id:56DDE706.6060702@bubblegen.co.uk
\r
94 >> 2016-03-08 (Tue) 14:16:01: show --format=raw --part=3 id:56DDE706.6060702@bubblegen.co.uk
\r
97 > I think the problem is in the following let form, which uses
\r
98 > notmuch-show-process-crypto. That isn't set in search mode. I'm unclear
\r
99 > on what the right solution is here; we could check
\r
100 > notmuch-crypto-process-mime, but I'm not sure how this would interact
\r
101 > with the handling of prefix arguments (for temporary toggling).
\r
103 Is "reply" from search mode a common pattern of use? Currently it seems
\r
104 generally un-useful (the thread has to contain just a single message -
\r
105 not just a single matching message).
\r
107 > (defun notmuch-mua-reply (query-string &optional sender reply-all)
\r
108 > (let ((args '("reply" "--format=sexp" "--format-version=1"))
\r
109 > (process-crypto notmuch-show-process-crypto)
\r