1 Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9669431FAF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 22:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id 7GwH4hp3QHVS for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Sun, 15 Apr 2012 22:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu
\r
19 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6BFC431FAE
\r
20 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 22:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
\r
21 Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
22 by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03FDD2E50D21;
\r
23 Sun, 15 Apr 2012 22:47:05 -0700 (PDT)
\r
24 X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new
\r
25 Received: from finestructure.net (unknown [76.89.193.65])
\r
26 (Authenticated sender: jrollins)
\r
27 by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F702E50D6A;
\r
28 Sun, 15 Apr 2012 22:47:02 -0700 (PDT)
\r
29 Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
\r
30 id C9BFF9C2; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 22:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
\r
31 From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
32 To: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>,
\r
33 Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>,
\r
34 Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
35 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] emacs: modify help message for
\r
36 notmuch-search-line-faces to reflect preferred "deleted" tag name.
\r
37 In-Reply-To: <m2ehrotg29.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
38 References: <87vcoaywyu.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
39 <1326826969-23545-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
40 <87iph06h72.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
41 <87ty0k4v5o.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
42 <m2ehrotg29.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
43 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+129~gfe33a4f (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1
\r
44 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
45 Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 22:46:17 -0700
\r
46 Message-ID: <87ehro44ba.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
48 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
\r
49 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
50 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
51 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
53 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
54 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
55 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
56 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
57 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
58 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
59 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
60 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
61 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
62 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 05:47:08 -0000
\r
66 On Sun, Apr 15 2012, Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> wrote:
\r
67 > id:"1326826969-23545-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net"
\r
69 > Does just "delete" -> "deleted" change: the only question I have left
\r
70 > is that should that be left as is, this change made, or just drop
\r
71 > the "delete" coloring altogether ?
\r
73 Sorry, yes, I suppose this patch should still be applied. Excludes for
\r
74 "deleted" are the default, I believe, so if we are going to refer to it
\r
75 in documentation we should probably be consistent.
\r
77 On Sun, Apr 15 2012, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
\r
78 > On Sun, Apr 15 2012, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:
\r
79 >> I think the rest of the series (which provides keybindings for
\r
80 >> adding/removing the delete tag to messages/threads) is worthwhile
\r
81 >> particularly now the exclude stuff is fairly complete (feedback at the
\r
82 >> time looked positive).
\r
84 > Sorry, I wish I could have purged all of these series from the list.
\r
85 > After a very protracted discussion on the topic it was decided that
\r
86 > notmuch will not support any delete tagging operations. Users who wish
\r
87 > to do so can add support on their own:
\r
89 I think my reaction here was a little strong. I'm not remembering how I
\r
90 got the impression that there was more opposition to adding delete
\r
91 keybindings than there was support. I suppose now that excludes work so
\r
92 well one (not me) might consider revisiting the issue.
\r
97 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
\r
99 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
100 Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
\r
102 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPi7IpAAoJEO00zqvie6q8GXIP/iMAjM3+Ho1Gk4yT3HLVTXTp
\r
103 ZWazCyPjQnt7lvB/nf4tDR9CWApY4xVlscQ1JW5cbcJqQLGpxHSPr8shmAJHQgti
\r
104 LkGdxw38MMBRYTnNiA6VoET8Sgey3wR/dj/qM/PkpIHlYO2bxWpdB0M6apl7/Etf
\r
105 uguLk7/mNbvhN5L3u88kSXTOwNRDF6YxPra7pNvn9M0EsQhPQUFoj/zLOcOoT7oP
\r
106 4yEkqtPReVoJLBeI8B+E1uizSR8DeCLdujmwDUkwJuHMI8i9KIKfu/p1Orv6lVTa
\r
107 +/t8UhokZGNSQErX5lJSKSO9Q82JRswGVBA8bN/cdfGlbGA9D+C4fP5PSNRAc1Qn
\r
108 +wwabp7DRyokYJuzLz+0zEFalaBKxVsdP1aFYr/dKS6Yuo2dD3N83j1GRAahKtF/
\r
109 LgmL5L0IiHTRbspmlSDSLitzbu3fnWnTF7ZjzreEq63HJqA/kuC7g8Mx8D8W1hLn
\r
110 JUI7Vj2RWISMAzlUQI9xC2NMkPdUjB7gqftpTnylNSSdlpBcMISrzU3kl/ANSKrZ
\r
111 d/3ckSt4or8LvGbiKbN1snAQVAosRSR6cAVNyE2WFWoIAW0F2BCJ05pc3N4UPiy2
\r
112 xNQS5pUxdt+qT5Siy2NYZP9l60u8dVSsDiYEQZDKn/tsFfC0yNlJdUPbmMcT1lta
\r
113 sNHMK0qHiSuJk2I/v2JP
\r
115 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r