1 Return-Path: <pieter@praet.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82ABE431FB6
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 06:35:38 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id PeqjUL0-31xv for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Fri, 3 Feb 2012 06:35:37 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from mail-ww0-f45.google.com (mail-ww0-f45.google.com
\r
18 [74.125.82.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client
\r
19 certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id
\r
20 71CBC431FAE for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 06:35:37 -0800
\r
22 Received: by wgbdt12 with SMTP id dt12so3410617wgb.2
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:35:36 -0800 (PST)
\r
24 Received: by 10.180.82.227 with SMTP id l3mr10062384wiy.1.1328279736169;
\r
25 Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:35:36 -0800 (PST)
\r
26 Received: from localhost ([109.131.13.166])
\r
27 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l6sm6938830wiv.11.2012.02.03.06.35.35
\r
28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
\r
29 Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:35:35 -0800 (PST)
\r
30 From: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>
\r
31 To: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>, Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
32 Subject: Re: olra.theworths.org mail forwarding delay?
\r
33 In-Reply-To: <m2obtgaw23.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
34 References: <87bopgp0y9.fsf@praet.org> <m2obtgaw23.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
35 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+132~ga81001f (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
36 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
\r
37 Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:33:32 +0100
\r
38 Message-ID: <8762fooukj.fsf@praet.org>
\r
40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
41 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
42 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
44 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
45 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
46 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
47 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
48 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
49 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
50 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
51 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
52 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
53 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:35:38 -0000
\r
55 On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:25:08 +0200, Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> wrote:
\r
56 > On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:15:42 +0100, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org> wrote:
\r
58 > > It appears some messages really enjoy the hospitality @ olra.theworths.org,
\r
59 > > because they stick around and party for quite a while before moving to their
\r
60 > > final destinations.
\r
62 > > Here's some examples:
\r
64 > > - id:"m28vkzoo8r.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi"
\r
65 > > - rcv: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 05:33:56 -0800 (PST)
\r
66 > > - fwd: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 08:57:19 -0800 (PST)
\r
68 > > - id:"87pqeas5mh.fsf@gmail.com"
\r
69 > > - rcv: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:15:16 -0800 (PST)
\r
70 > > - fwd: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 08:57:25 -0800 (PST)
\r
72 > > - id:"m2hazk83xw.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi"
\r
73 > > - rcv: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 02:35:52 -0800 (PST)
\r
74 > > - fwd: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 08:57:30 -0800 (PST)
\r
76 > > - id:"alpine.DEB.2.02.1201132130220.21970@ltspubuntu4.int.smq.datapipe.net"
\r
77 > > - rcv: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 18:52:15 -0800 (PST)
\r
78 > > - fwd: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 08:56:35 -0800 (PST)
\r
80 > > That last one might have been stuck in the approval queue, but the
\r
81 > > others should definitely have propagated a lot sooner, no?
\r
83 > Those 2 my emails had From: email address which is not subscribed
\r
87 Oh, now that you mention it.
\r
89 Assuming the others suffered the same issue, all is well in Mailman-land.
\r