1 Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CF77431FB6
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 08:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id C4ULgslHLU3A for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Thu, 28 Jun 2012 08:13:41 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238])
\r
18 (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE8A1431FAF
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 08:13:41 -0700 (PDT)
\r
22 Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034089108.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net
\r
23 ([156.34.89.108] helo=zancas.localnet)
\r
24 by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
\r
25 (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)
\r
26 id 1SkGPc-0001sr-LY; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:13:40 -0300
\r
27 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.77)
\r
28 (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)
\r
29 id 1SkGPX-0005AZ-5Z; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:13:35 -0300
\r
30 From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
\r
31 To: Ethan <ethan.glasser.camp@gmail.com>,
\r
32 Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>
\r
33 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/14] modular mail stores based on URIs
\r
35 <CAOJ+Ob0Kw0Kkhh9C27Xv9gvqtNowzQiNqrLAtvti7fL8NND2+w@mail.gmail.com>
\r
36 References: <1340656899-5644-1-git-send-email-ethan@betacantrips.com>
\r
37 <877gutnmf1.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
38 <CAOJ+Ob0Kw0Kkhh9C27Xv9gvqtNowzQiNqrLAtvti7fL8NND2+w@mail.gmail.com>
\r
39 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1
\r
40 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
41 Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:13:35 -0300
\r
42 Message-ID: <87hatvlba8.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
44 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
46 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
47 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
48 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
50 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
51 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
52 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
53 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
54 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
55 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
56 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
57 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
58 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
59 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:13:42 -0000
\r
61 Ethan <ethan.glasser.camp@gmail.com> writes:
\r
63 > Yeah, I don't even know how an mbox message gets flagged read and I don't
\r
64 > know how I would support it.
\r
67 I think read only access to mboxes is fine. Yes, somebody will be
\r
68 unhappy, but the only convincing argument I have heard for mboxes or
\r
69 similar formats is archival use.
\r