Re: Hi all
[notmuch-archives.git] / c8 / dcb2cf4ac25c6fd3f29b0d88e4cc3194bad36e
1 Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@nixu.com>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C975E429E54\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:58:03 -0800 (PST)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: 0\r
10 X-Spam-Level: \r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
12         autolearn=disabled\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
15         with ESMTP id hPtDRYyM3o95 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
16         Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:58:00 -0800 (PST)\r
17 Received: from mail-gw3.nixu.fi (mail-gw3.nixu.fi [193.209.237.7])\r
18         (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
19         (No client certificate requested)\r
20         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D3B8429E21\r
21         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:58:00 -0800 (PST)\r
22 Received: from pps.filterd (mail-gw3 [127.0.0.1])\r
23         by mail-gw3.nixu.fi (8.14.4/8.14.4) with SMTP id q0O8rAON006943;\r
24         Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:57:55 +0200\r
25 Received: from taco2.nixu.fi (taco2.nixu.fi [194.197.118.31])\r
26         by mail-gw3.nixu.fi with ESMTP id 114cs1c31s-1\r
27         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);\r
28         Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:57:54 +0200\r
29 Received: from taco2.nixu.fi (taco2.nixu.fi [194.197.118.31])\r
30         by taco2.nixu.fi (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id\r
31         q0O8vqen003661; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:57:52 +0200\r
32 From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
33 To: Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
34 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] mime node: Record depth-first part numbers\r
35 In-Reply-To: <1327361590-19273-2-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu>\r
36 References: <1326918507-28033-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu>\r
37         <1327361590-19273-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu>\r
38         <1327361590-19273-2-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu>\r
39 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+71~gefa5d6c (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
40         (i686-pc-linux-gnu)\r
41 X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL\r
42         $[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F\r
43         !)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z\r
44 Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:57:52 +0200\r
45 Message-ID: <yf6ipk1pje7.fsf@taco2.nixu.fi>\r
46 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
47 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
48 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.6.7361,\r
49  1.0.211,       0.0.0000        definitions=2012-01-24_01:2012-01-24, 2012-01-24,\r
50         1970-01-01 signatures=0\r
51 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0\r
52         ipscore=0 suspectscore=0\r
53         phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0\r
54         reason=mlx\r
55         scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1201240012\r
56 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
57 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
58 Precedence: list\r
59 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
60         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
61 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
62         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
63 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
64 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
65 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
66 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
67         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
68 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:58:04 -0000\r
69 \r
70 On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:33:09 -0500, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU> wrote:\r
71 > This makes the part numbers readily accessible to formatters.\r
72 > Hierarchical part numbering would be a more natural and efficient fit\r
73 > for MIME and may be the way to go in the future, but depth-first\r
74 > numbering maintains compatibility with what we currently do.\r
75 > ---\r
76 \r
77 LGTM. Good that the comment about dropping const is gone.\r
78 \r
79 Tomi\r
80 \r