c7/65202c2760becde9052cd9feb02e608fc58c56

   1 Return-Path: <servilio@gmail.com>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B54431FD0\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun,  3 Jul 2011 07:41:47 -0700 (PDT)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
  12         tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
  13         FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
  14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  15         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  16         with ESMTP id qJ9mDKzDxcNI for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  17         Sun,  3 Jul 2011 07:41:45 -0700 (PDT)\r
  18 Received: from mail-pv0-f181.google.com (mail-pv0-f181.google.com\r
  19         [74.125.83.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
  20         (No client certificate requested)\r
  21         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08C50431FB6\r
  22         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun,  3 Jul 2011 07:41:44 -0700 (PDT)\r
  23 Received: by pvg13 with SMTP id 13so4491009pvg.26\r
  24         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 07:41:44 -0700 (PDT)\r
  25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
  26         h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to\r
  27         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;\r
  28         bh=2BvAB2VX89q129RBFDLBFAsmFo4n9d1cgLAHAnyBQhY=;\r
  29         b=jVLgcDzbcoW9KiXeNr8GRE5H12np8PSxKM8SsBxpyCy6V9DL1919x73kgq/hZrMFSP\r
  30         0+a/+GcYwdkMgOOnOGN2C6usLHGUpdPwP215Jatdvsa3io6x/aRLOlPt2IHr2RbOz8HT\r
  31         5ooxgirwRWRERupk94naRKPBUXRM3jS6IUlv8=\r
  32 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  33 Received: by 10.68.9.162 with SMTP id a2mr6219151pbb.300.1309704104072; Sun,\r
  34         03 Jul 2011 07:41:44 -0700 (PDT)\r
  35 Received: by 10.68.43.170 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 07:41:43 -0700 (PDT)\r
  36 In-Reply-To: <87iprj5yab.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
  37 References: <87y60hn0mg.fsf@zancas.localnet> <yun7h81brkn.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>\r
  38         <87tyb5mumf.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
  39         <CAPFwwQhGy6a4Hes2-7r8B2J=eaE_+07p4FGoh5ds=Ws1_+5H5w@mail.gmail.com>\r
  40         <874o347fot.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
  41         <CAPFwwQiVXwQRZ84L5hg5ONwTg1QdXLUytCCp8gKxnp=jfie6XA@mail.gmail.com>\r
  42         <87iprj5yab.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
  43 Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 10:41:43 -0400\r
  44 Message-ID:\r
  45  <CAPFwwQi3mXRghMJzSma9qf35rMJ3yPK+omcX+x4tL8urx_yHhA@mail.gmail.com>\r
  46 Subject: Re: branchs and tags and merges oh my!\r
  47 From: servilio <servilio@gmail.com>\r
  48 To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>\r
  49 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\r
  50 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
  51 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  52 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  53 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  54 Precedence: list\r
  55 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  56         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  57 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  58         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  59 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  60 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  61 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  62 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  63         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  64 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2011 14:41:47 -0000\r
  65 \r
  66 On 3 July 2011 08:44, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:\r
  67 > On Sun, 3 Jul 2011 03:14:03 -0400, servilio <servilio@gmail.com> wrote:\r
  68 >>\r
  69 >> I think there is no need for tags on master, "make dist" should only\r
  70 >> be run on the "release" branch, right?\r
  71 >\r
  72 > It isn't just about make dist (which I anyway thinks makes sense to run\r
  73 > on master to make snapshots). Every compilation from git gets a version\r
  74 > number from running git-describe. =C2=A0So unless we want all developers =\r
  75 to\r
  76 > have useless/annoying version numbers, we have to care about tags on\r
  77 > master.\r
  78 \r
  79 Why not just generate version when building from master in a different way?\r
  80 \r
  81 Servilio\r