1 Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C06FA431FC4
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 03:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id Pfsqy3ZjmJDL for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Sun, 19 Oct 2014 03:02:47 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6966431FBF
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 03:02:47 -0700 (PDT)
\r
20 Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1])
\r
21 by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8301F10008C;
\r
22 Sun, 19 Oct 2014 13:02:28 +0300 (EEST)
\r
23 From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
\r
24 To: Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
25 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] cli: Extend the search command
\r
26 for --output={sender, recipients}
\r
27 In-Reply-To: <871tqbejl5.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
\r
28 References: <87zjd51phx.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
\r
29 <1413150093-8383-1-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
\r
30 <1413150093-8383-4-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
\r
31 <m238arrdzp.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
32 <871tqbejl5.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
\r
33 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1+130~ga61922f (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1
\r
34 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
\r
35 X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL
\r
36 $[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F
\r
37 !)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z
\r
38 Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 13:02:28 +0300
\r
39 Message-ID: <m2k33wbcnf.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
41 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
42 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
43 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
45 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
46 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
47 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
48 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
49 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
50 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
51 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
52 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
53 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
54 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 10:02:54 -0000
\r
57 Hi Michal, been busy lately so I haven't got into this...
\r
59 ... I'll look into it in a bit more detail a bit later,
\r
62 On Tue, Oct 14 2014, Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> wrote:
\r
65 > I don't know. You seem to think about this in the opposite way than how
\r
66 > it is implemented. The implementation really filters things out whereas
\r
67 > you specify what not to filter.
\r
69 > My feeling is that if you would implement your proposal, the code would
\r
70 > be more complex than in my patch, because the mapping between command
\r
71 > line options and the actual algorithm would require some extra code. And
\r
72 > in a previous comment, you preferred simplicity.
\r
74 Yes, maybe the choice of reusing --duplicate was bad, and perhaps took
\r
75 thought from the main point -- what kind output options should be possible...
\r
77 > Hopefully, you consider the above as "healthy" criticism.
\r
79 Yes, I do -- I hope we can get something decent out in this in near future,
\r
80 with duplicate filtering that can have useful options to be used directly
\r
81 by MUAs and no duplicate filtering option which I can use in
\r
82 nottoomuch-addresses in 2016 ;D
\r
86 > Thanks for quick review.
\r
projects / notmuch-archives.git / blob