1 Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12375431FD5
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 2 Feb 2014 05:04:09 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id wRmijV3GcbAQ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Sun, 2 Feb 2014 05:04:01 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from mail-ee0-f41.google.com (mail-ee0-f41.google.com
\r
18 [74.125.83.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client
\r
19 certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id
\r
20 8BE77431FC0 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 2 Feb 2014 05:04:01 -0800
\r
22 Received: by mail-ee0-f41.google.com with SMTP id e51so1121181eek.28
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 05:04:00 -0800 (PST)
\r
24 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
\r
25 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
\r
26 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references
\r
27 :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;
\r
28 bh=kWDWVtPk2HyOBQyEZ5W6MBnaRRf6M75lxVpXjo4czzs=;
\r
29 b=ZPnKUS4z1lC0ew+mQPIV0dkrwRgZMeY9Wr0YG7NfZCPXK8k5oipPwOCWaRp4KTckaw
\r
30 +PUKr/sQk0CVi/S9zNKZl2/WLuLoc3slexyjITfmj9RoF+ReTv5Byf1Y0jPNVjnJlg9/
\r
31 MPJmmmu5ySJun160CkBjeBBmhqtVJU9PMJSYzGMxO4J8gdarTb12Baq3O9ZgigmNBqdj
\r
32 K+Z0729EFhrXZxnMECr6p2v2ElD//CVpImq6PNNmU53Hdtm2uPLy6J0ccXX6q3ItfSZl
\r
33 T8YLtw3+gg+kC52O1e8KBUfQ6ur5ka9SgzNwPgjrLha0KftX3Y6qWekH11PH5uiL0EQ9
\r
36 ALoCoQm5pXGmraZ+Z/9Nsou/u0AIXuroVF2tNxoM7HUoHLP+VIn4z+lw8ufGpp/04bc4gmhDNMUg
\r
37 X-Received: by 10.14.101.5 with SMTP id a5mr1535202eeg.63.1391346240457;
\r
38 Sun, 02 Feb 2014 05:04:00 -0800 (PST)
\r
39 Received: from localhost (dsl-hkibrasgw2-58c36f-91.dhcp.inet.fi.
\r
40 [88.195.111.91]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
\r
41 z49sm61810033eeo.10.2014.02.02.05.03.58 for <multiple recipients>
\r
42 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
\r
43 Sun, 02 Feb 2014 05:03:59 -0800 (PST)
\r
44 From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>
\r
45 To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
46 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] lib: replace the message header parser with gmime
\r
47 In-Reply-To: <87ob3di0md.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
48 References: <cover.1385825425.git.jani@nikula.org>
\r
49 <87ob3di0md.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
50 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+44~ge3b4cd9 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1
\r
51 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
52 Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 15:03:52 +0200
\r
53 Message-ID: <871tzly8cn.fsf@nikula.org>
\r
55 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
56 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
57 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
59 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
60 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
61 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
62 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
63 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
64 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
65 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
66 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
67 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
68 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 13:04:09 -0000
\r
70 On Wed, 15 Jan 2014, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:
\r
71 > Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> writes:
\r
73 >> This is v2 of id:cover.1381948853.git.jani@nikula.org with more polish.
\r
75 >> Patches 1-4 do prep work to fix some of the differences in the parsers
\r
76 >> in advance. Arguably they are not that bad regardless of the parser
\r
79 >> Patches 5-6 actually make the change. Having two patches is a somewhat
\r
80 >> artificial division, but perhaps makes it easier to review.
\r
83 > I had a quick look at these changes, and nothing jumped out at me. I'd
\r
84 > appreciate a second pair of eyes on them.
\r
88 Patches 1-4 are pretty straightforward prep work, IMHO useful on their
\r
89 own too. It would help just to get them reviewed and merged first.
\r
96 > I ran the performance suite, and there is only one message (in version
\r
97 > 0.4 of the corpus) newly classified as non-mail. Of course I did clean
\r
98 > up the corpus a bunch from 0.3 to 0.4. I didn't see any shocking changes
\r
99 > in performance before and after the patches. I only had patience enough
\r
100 > to run twice in both cases.
\r