1 Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A4A4431FC2
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 9 Feb 2014 04:53:55 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id 2g5ujCO+fEYv for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Sun, 9 Feb 2014 04:53:50 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155])
\r
18 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E282431FBD
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 9 Feb 2014 04:53:50 -0800 (PST)
\r
22 Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80)
\r
23 (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)
\r
24 id 1WCTtC-0000Ld-Iq; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 08:53:38 -0400
\r
25 Received: (nullmailer pid 27173 invoked by uid 1000); Sun, 09 Feb 2014
\r
27 From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
\r
28 To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>, "W. Trevor King"
\r
30 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] emacs: Prefer Content-Description over filename for
\r
32 In-Reply-To: <878utkd2bj.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
33 References: <877g9chbay.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
34 <cover.1391423201.git.wking@tremily.us>
\r
35 <27be295875a7df782a83c9a2c09d06f9d321fe9e.1391423201.git.wking@tremily.us>
\r
36 <87vbwwosuw.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> <20140203203418.GO14197@odin.tremily.us>
\r
37 <20140204013246.GQ19935@odin.tremily.us> <87r47dojbt.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
38 <20140208165931.GB17142@odin.tremily.us> <878utkd2bj.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
39 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+53~g3e1d7f6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1
\r
40 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
41 Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 08:53:35 -0400
\r
42 Message-ID: <871tzco3ao.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
44 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
45 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
46 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
47 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
49 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
50 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
51 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
52 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
53 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
54 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
55 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
56 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
57 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
58 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 12:53:55 -0000
\r
60 Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> writes:
\r
63 > Looking at the code for that pathway we use
\r
64 > g_mime_message_get_recipients followed by
\r
65 > internet_address_list_to_string and we only output a cc: pair if this is
\r
66 > non-null (which means we had an address)
\r
68 > In light of that I think changing the cli to only output
\r
69 > content-description if non-null seems consistent.
\r
72 OK, I can live with it. Thanks for the analysis Mark.
\r