1 Return-Path: <xma@gnu.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8570D41A550
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:20:48 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.363, TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP=1]
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id LZGBrsCm22D7 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:20:47 -0800 (PST)
\r
18 Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (cha51-3-88-164-105-66.fbx.proxad.net
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDCB5431FB5
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:20:47 -0800 (PST)
\r
22 Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (xhlj.maillard.im [127.0.0.1])
\r
23 by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTP id 392ED20384
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 23:20:46 +0100 (CET)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=maillard.im; h=from:to
\r
26 :subject:reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=
\r
27 postfix; bh=broZt7Lqu3D8nCokpXYxuM9dghs=; b=i8VotkeymFrJLxRj3SqB
\r
28 VNJ4+4FQWx5J4oafl6pWtvIknBFBKEs+Osh6en7SJ444mm03uzXAn5oN/P0qkmqF
\r
29 4VAIR1wR9z7W3BrTA93Zg/yTf+Md01p8hRMOHIX610B6IykacNFzHbMpSXmJNRBC
\r
30 76ZGbELfD5RJto6ni7KohJM=
\r
31 Received: from maillard.im (unknown [192.168.0.254])
\r
32 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
33 (No client certificate requested)
\r
34 by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA
\r
35 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 23:20:46 +0100 (CET)
\r
36 From: Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>
\r
37 To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
38 Subject: [FEATURE REQUEST]: post-processing on notmuch new
\r
39 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1
\r
40 (i486-slackware-linux-gnu)
\r
41 Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 23:27:45 +0100
\r
42 Message-ID: <m28w0i2w7y.fsf@kcals.maillard.im>
\r
44 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
45 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
46 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
48 Reply-To: Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>
\r
49 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
50 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
51 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
52 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
53 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
54 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
55 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
56 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
57 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
58 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 22:20:48 -0000
\r
62 Am I alone thinking it could be cool to specify a post-processing script
\r
63 to run after 'notmuch new' ?
\r
65 Currently, one can tell notmuch to add a unique tag but I guess we could
\r
66 extend this to something much smarter. I guess I am not alone using a
\r
67 tagging script after each refresh.
\r