b5/14c67dc19e0896c219a65f3de7f71d18ad6b61

   1 Return-Path: <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898DF431FC2\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  9 May 2014 05:50:13 -0700 (PDT)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
  12         tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
  13         FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
  14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  15         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  16         with ESMTP id GEQobLQxDxcv for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  17         Fri,  9 May 2014 05:50:08 -0700 (PDT)\r
  18 Received: from mail-ee0-f49.google.com (mail-ee0-f49.google.com\r
  19  [74.125.83.49])        (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))        (No client\r
  20  certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id\r
  21  972FA431FBC    for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  9 May 2014 05:50:08 -0700\r
  22  (PDT)\r
  23 Received: by mail-ee0-f49.google.com with SMTP id e53so2634274eek.8\r
  24         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 09 May 2014 05:50:07 -0700 (PDT)\r
  25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
  26         h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to\r
  27         :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition\r
  28         :in-reply-to:user-agent;\r
  29         bh=IUK//qR2s0X8RHBoB1+VZbGZoDGMhL4exMY8viUUcbk=;\r
  30         b=eQ3x+AnWPLWPTJZCrR1ijqyNVTy08Am/e3w+W82KS5kYXN8GLX0Muif7aAVT5PFpSl\r
  31         haAorblQJcS9+dN4RVxaY22+v0rpjovNhvOt9jl5Y8B/x1EwkIRAIUSbXK7ab8Mfjlu5\r
  32         CB/oMUPYXS/EWC4ROXnqjQR6VyIPP0J846iMsi28S93fJjIvx3S5LnwbgGZYE+wf8LVx\r
  33         IaHb+kx6CwnLj4hr6J1cYaKFlJMk0XXHvr24SVQnHmpuPOjupJSXd60nJhcJ26fy+YeM\r
  34         aJOF/YvU5dQroPsyauPTQ/XO8zxAFap63AqxEitVWA9PvENYLk7zTAlK7loD4vHu+8gT\r
  35         U0Fg==\r
  36 X-Received: by 10.15.35.66 with SMTP id f42mr13071037eev.93.1399639807082;\r
  37         Fri, 09 May 2014 05:50:07 -0700 (PDT)\r
  38 Received: from chitra.no-ip.org ([2001:610:120:3001:2ad2:44ff:fe4a:b029])\r
  39         by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id i4sm9482736eeg.28.2014.05.09.05.50.06\r
  40         for <multiple recipients>\r
  41         (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);\r
  42         Fri, 09 May 2014 05:50:06 -0700 (PDT)\r
  43 Sender: Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu@gmail.com>\r
  44 Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 14:50:04 +0200\r
  45 From: Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>\r
  46 To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
  47 Subject: Re: Submodules for language bindings (was: Github?)\r
  48 Message-ID: <20140509125004.GF2634@chitra.no-ip.org>\r
  49 Mail-Followup-To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>,\r
  50         notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  51 References:\r
  52  <CA+kKtKA8Q5z6Pys9RAumLTiJvmGwWYKGXDkKr9Mh_6ecV-7sdA@mail.gmail.com>\r
  53         <CA+kKtKCP8Oo2sHz5Cd0+=BmS9UK=b2h9GrGopUFwWZ=GJUXqyA@mail.gmail.com>\r
  54         <20140508203019.GA2374@chitra.no-ip.org>\r
  55         <20140508212100.GD23124@vilya.m0g.net>\r
  56         <20140508220046.GB2374@chitra.no-ip.org>\r
  57         <20140508222931.GU28634@odin.tremily.us>\r
  58         <20140508224527.GC2374@chitra.no-ip.org>\r
  59         <20140508233530.GV28634@odin.tremily.us>\r
  60         <20140509113951.GD2634@chitra.no-ip.org>\r
  61         <536cccbb2aa31_771b11792f0c0@nysa.notmuch>\r
  62 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  63 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
  64 Content-Disposition: inline\r
  65 In-Reply-To: <536cccbb2aa31_771b11792f0c0@nysa.notmuch>\r
  66 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22.1 (2013-10-16)\r
  67 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  68 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  69 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  70 Precedence: list\r
  71 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  72         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  73 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  74         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  75 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  76 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  77 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  78 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  79         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  80 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 12:50:13 -0000\r
  81 \r
  82 On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 07:40:27AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:\r
  83 > Suvayu Ali wrote:\r
  84 > \r
  85 > > To explain my point with RPM specifics, if I were to\r
  86 > > use separate spec files, python-notmuch would have:\r
  87 > > \r
  88 > >   Requires: notmuch >= <version-string>\r
  89 > > \r
  90 > > As you can see this only allows for tracking dependency based on\r
  91 > > official version numbers.  With more bindings, many with different\r
  92 > > version dependencies, this becomes quite cumbersome;\r
  93 > \r
  94 > No, it doesn't:\r
  95 > \r
  96 >   %package notmuch-ruby\r
  97 >   Requires: notmuch = %{version}-%{release}, ruby\r
  98 \r
  99 Doesn't that work when you have one spec file for all sub-packages (as I\r
 100 do now)?  I was responding to Trevor's suggestion about not having\r
 101 sub-packages, IOW, different spec files for different packages.\r
 102 \r
 103 -- \r
 104 Suvayu\r
 105 \r
 106 Open source is the future. It sets us free.\r