1 Return-Path: <bgamari.foss@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 109FB429E4D
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 12:06:20 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id d7fmVzvwhJvQ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Mon, 4 Nov 2013 12:06:12 -0800 (PST)
\r
18 Received: from mail-qc0-f179.google.com (mail-qc0-f179.google.com
\r
19 [209.85.216.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CF57429E36
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 12:06:11 -0800 (PST)
\r
23 Received: by mail-qc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id k18so4248012qcv.38
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 12:06:11 -0800 (PST)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
\r
26 h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id
\r
27 :mime-version:content-type;
\r
28 bh=VrR/+xHPTHqBwJoBVmWNHqeHh6WsHNGkaUpPo0asZ14=;
\r
29 b=XaY6+cd5f+qGJSDgAU+rgjOhJcPaUxMqumKf8W6yImvcF/YOe5gPHMArZl9Wk4jW+p
\r
30 +R6Ivj1ApNTrHlWXT40YV6ILiIi4GFGYV1U+IAWwMGZePcM8mvHJh7rAcPq/B0FI5+8v
\r
31 icILGvZBbHmgnv8z2eCP/MImSFgi5OxdYl3vZcccmcGEEFVg1Q5Nd6T97trARa3DHJbG
\r
32 +AH8kepP1yi2tCZCFE8mq9vjM0VoNfJ4Ehg7+ukX0CZ+y99X/zGnK/IQeXR94e0IxVaj
\r
33 04GONIQNLRBM8s7etKk5V270lIOZEaCfK4nNHPs+Fh6ZEhYOKbtGsbDhQ14CpG6rxvMT
\r
35 X-Received: by 10.49.30.66 with SMTP id q2mr24593477qeh.38.1383595570458;
\r
36 Mon, 04 Nov 2013 12:06:10 -0800 (PST)
\r
37 Received: from localhost (gamari.physics.umass.edu. [128.119.56.223])
\r
38 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id jw9sm50857040qeb.2.2013.11.04.12.06.09
\r
39 for <multiple recipients>
\r
40 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
\r
41 Mon, 04 Nov 2013 12:06:09 -0800 (PST)
\r
42 From: Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@gmail.com>
\r
43 To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
44 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] database: Handle error while deleting uncompacted
\r
46 In-Reply-To: <87fvrfrnzy.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
47 References: <1382998997-9938-1-git-send-email-bgamari.foss@gmail.com>
\r
48 <1382998997-9938-4-git-send-email-bgamari.foss@gmail.com>
\r
49 <87fvrfrnzy.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
50 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.16+107~g1ef2773 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1
\r
51 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
52 Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 15:06:07 -0500
\r
53 Message-ID: <87zjpknd8w.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
55 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
\r
56 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
57 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
58 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
60 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
61 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
62 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
63 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
64 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
65 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
66 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
67 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
68 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
69 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 20:06:20 -0000
\r
72 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
74 David Bremner <david@tethera.net> writes:
\r
76 > Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@gmail.com> writes:
\r
78 >> We never checked to ensure that the rmtree() of the old database
\r
82 > Is there some reason these patches (and the existing compact code in the
\r
83 > lib) is using fprintf and not the status callback function? Most places
\r
84 > we don't (yet) have logging callbacks, but here we do.
\r
86 Nope. I simply wasn't aware of this infrastructure. I can put together a
\r
94 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
\r
96 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
97 Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
\r
99 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSd/4vAAoJEErkyLZmeNiDDgoH/i78hudgxfKzBvru6O7UYots
\r
100 PbEyHg89Fa3KZbmNWVVlcdS3+ZOA/IMKgJ9JI8j0Qdt0GphLTmRP9PidWLRod9UX
\r
101 7CqQ70wxrl7BHkyY3xHjt8WjZR/Upb7iFQzeobwpLoc53v3vq7rj2WznEbRxi6AW
\r
102 ZYpLjxrMMKrq0/tKkM22bzv5SO0r+5YPngDpd3y42kvSCZUlbD86USY7cynH1jAN
\r
103 xSRh65g4mMKW1sg9naMpETUogV4vw3Kk56qTMkoi6Kt/LcaiuI5u4n4AOI6LfyIQ
\r
104 lPOOjFy2/rSHqbGVZ7lAkoCikYzfMLK1aM47CmizanJlkguytlKoSQiHFxrgHJo=
\r
106 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r