[PATCH v2 04/10] configure: check for -Wl,-rpath (Solaris support)
[notmuch-archives.git] / b2 / d0d9d898d399bcd218ab4bb13539bfc742f4f1
1 Return-Path: <seb.binet@gmail.com>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73792431FD0\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:01:14 -0700 (PDT)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "Cc"\r
9 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
10 X-Spam-Score: -0.789\r
11 X-Spam-Level: \r
12 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.789 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
13         tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
14         FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01]\r
15         autolearn=disabled\r
16 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
17         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
18         with ESMTP id fLVad+f5ejty for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
19         Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:01:14 -0700 (PDT)\r
20 Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com\r
21         [74.125.82.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
22         (No client certificate requested)\r
23         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6772431FB6\r
24         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:01:13 -0700 (PDT)\r
25 Received: by wyb28 with SMTP id 28so3276532wyb.26\r
26         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:01:12 -0700 (PDT)\r
27 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
28         h=domainkey-signature:from:to:cc:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references\r
29         :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;\r
30         bh=OG/szENbxkD02TrHdPF09Uhlz2X1kUXr8qSJTSXnbIw=;\r
31         b=EGGicd52uUGKPJH8OuEbuj0GTZkl94UPgOoVn+B9qaBefs1cV1h8b9PYhQ3GtyXe9g\r
32         zMEyMXXwt3v8VMtAMVq3RfcYFgU2NNJXIPWqS2Pq70syapI6Lt4GNA1m7OlnS35EcZVF\r
33         EghyJkI4He/DgQukF2wDtT6nIdiiniSL4E6to=\r
34 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
35         h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date\r
36         :message-id:mime-version:content-type;\r
37         b=XgD5wXx9+Gbb60BGhWkPy0Eeruwa6NyxvLN0gpUmFnXHkyz/I7xUCUCXQI4aIupTfR\r
38         xOs6bT7WgLhKfQhCN2cbBSWsmwWROvjLYnLfV8aXeY3S7Vwf/u9R/y/ExyspnCSB6IJ2\r
39         2XOJW7S9v17b6kzB4jthDAQ8+80DEi5C2N1GM=\r
40 Received: by 10.227.24.72 with SMTP id u8mr6154336wbb.94.1308661272131;\r
41         Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:01:12 -0700 (PDT)\r
42 Received: from localhost (pc-88068.lal.in2p3.fr [134.158.88.68])\r
43         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o19sm3989713wbh.21.2011.06.21.06.01.10\r
44         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
45         Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:01:11 -0700 (PDT)\r
46 From: Sebastien Binet <seb.binet@gmail.com>\r
47 To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
48 Subject: Re: bug in emacs-ui ?\r
49 In-Reply-To: <87hb7jg2rl.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
50 References: <8739j5rn2d.fsf@cern.ch>\r
51         <87pqm8cz4f.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
52         <87oc1spkkc.fsf@cern.ch>\r
53         <87mxhccw9v.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
54         <87hb7kpi7e.fsf@cern.ch>\r
55         <87fwn4cm9q.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
56         <BANLkTin=viaP4US-=qj2x7BQOKhGaLeaHw@mail.gmail.com>\r
57         <87hb7jg2rl.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
58 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-238-gc39b492 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
59         (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)\r
60 Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:59:37 +0200\r
61 Message-ID: <87vcvzs5l2.fsf@cern.ch>\r
62 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
63 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
64         micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
65 Cc: , notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
66 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
67 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
68 Precedence: list\r
69 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
70         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
71 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
72         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
73 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
74 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
75 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
76 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
77         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
78 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:01:14 -0000\r
79 \r
80 --=-=-=\r
81 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
82 \r
83 On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:41:18 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestr=\r
84 ucture.net> wrote:\r
85 Non-text part: multipart/signed\r
86 > On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 02:01:17 +0200, Sebastien Binet <seb.binet@gmail.com>=\r
87  wrote:\r
88 > > and I checked there were no lingering .el files...\r
89 > >=20\r
90 > > so...\r
91 > >  any way to tell which notmuch-emacs-ui I am actually using ? (I am a n=\r
92 ewbie\r
93 > > when comes to hacking lisp)\r
94 >=20\r
95 > Hey, Sebastien.  You can determine the loaded version of a library from\r
96 > within emacs with the follow command:\r
97 >=20\r
98 > M-x locate-library notmuch\r
99 which points to the system-wide one.\r
100 \r
101 >=20\r
102 > It's also good to know how many notmuch instances are installed on your\r
103 > system.  For instance, I have a system-wide installation, a "personal"\r
104 > installation, the build currently in the source tree, etc.  Depending on\r
105 > the options I supply to emacs at startup, I could run a variety of\r
106 > versions.\r
107 being root and having this great ArchLinux package manager system at my\r
108 finger tips, I only have one installation of notmuch :)\r
109 \r
110 playing a bit more, I cloned your 0.6 branch, cloned the official one,\r
111 slammed the 0.6/emacs directory on top of the official one, built the\r
112 official one, installed it and everything worked.\r
113 \r
114 I am trying to see which changeset is the source of my problem...\r
115 \r
116 =2Ds\r
117 \r
118 --=-=-=\r
119 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
120 \r
121 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
122 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
123 \r
124 iEYEARECAAYFAk4AlbkACgkQPj4AVbsZCCb3DwCgu7+GCzvsiYVWbDwMw0K1FyDq\r
125 YegAoJHX5nqem9A9pB+CiRpK3+PiGd22\r
126 =yuqX\r
127 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
128 --=-=-=--\r