1 Return-Path: <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8F03431FB6
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 18:45:43 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id tHQXn9IdO9qF for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Thu, 14 Feb 2013 18:45:43 -0800 (PST)
\r
18 Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com
\r
19 [209.85.212.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59B81431FAF
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 18:45:43 -0800 (PST)
\r
23 Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id ez12so627945wid.11
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 18:45:42 -0800 (PST)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
\r
26 h=x-received:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id
\r
27 :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type
\r
28 :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
\r
29 bh=WTygxvZQkLaWmUbTDcxBEa0Gm5Ot6FbYyxEmCoD8/zs=;
\r
30 b=YnZ+2z8MCPcMgIduPoUQht3NCRY67r2YOKOsApCHYb2MMVyuOYtHlPuVEfI0XK8G3Q
\r
31 aObm0Et5VjLtFfSHqZ3XrfNnoJgA42aa7zNmmq11KjhAN1U/XGWxvEWbK9C/3JcEH0Fq
\r
32 fMuf1JdgczgS0pT9fzhDUOeI9e0W08Iv3vVGoS8uGPlxkE981RHOsRWUy4DwuzCXrBYi
\r
33 gvvcDN9cqxZsv9Q0gx0aEwJJoBXSwTsV3sm/6rfzEyB+diewkd0loh5VrO0fRq31qpQZ
\r
34 f2VdnlWm4VE6qnaZ/RiY4bShC9uk+DBdNZf8PVNFSDp5xAP2+bXFoypErNAhEq3btlkb
\r
36 X-Received: by 10.195.13.11 with SMTP id eu11mr1336196wjd.39.1360896340728;
\r
37 Thu, 14 Feb 2013 18:45:40 -0800 (PST)
\r
38 Received: from kuru.dyndns-at-home.com
\r
39 (AAnnecy-651-1-327-76.w90-36.abo.wanadoo.fr. [90.36.246.76])
\r
40 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ex15sm2502101wid.5.2013.02.14.18.45.38
\r
41 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
\r
42 Thu, 14 Feb 2013 18:45:39 -0800 (PST)
\r
43 Sender: suvayu ali <fatkasuvayu@gmail.com>
\r
44 Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 03:45:35 +0100
\r
45 From: Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>
\r
46 To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
47 Subject: Re: notmuch-mutt: Use of uninitialized value.
\r
48 Message-ID: <20130215024535.GA3423@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com>
\r
49 Mail-Followup-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org, Stefano Zacchiroli
\r
51 References: <20130212005801.GA8419@soarin> <20130213223535.GA3258@zaogao.lan>
\r
52 <20130213233657.GA4489@soarin> <20130214083713.GA4123@upsilon.cc>
\r
53 <20130214230651.GA3247@zaogao.lan>
\r
55 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
56 Content-Disposition: inline
\r
57 In-Reply-To: <20130214230651.GA3247@zaogao.lan>
\r
58 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30)
\r
59 Cc: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@upsilon.cc>
\r
60 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
61 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
63 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
64 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
65 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
66 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
67 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
68 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
69 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
70 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
71 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
72 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 02:45:44 -0000
\r
74 Hi Kevin and others,
\r
76 On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 03:06:51PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
\r
78 > Here are some proposed improved macros. (I'll attach a patch file in
\r
79 > another email.) Despite my earlier warning about not line-breaking
\r
80 > macros, these are getting a bit unreadable. We may want to see
\r
81 > if/where we can safely line-break them.
\r
83 I find sticking by the rule "do not introduce whitespaces to make it
\r
84 readable" very useful in multi-line macros. For example,
\r
86 macro index <key> "<some-long-function>some text<another-function>\
\r
87 continuation<finally-the-end>"
\r
89 the above is preferable over,
\r
91 macro index <key> "<some-long-function>some text<another-function> \
\r
92 continuation<finally-the-end>"
\r
99 Open source is the future. It sets us free.
\r