Re: [PATCH 1/1] emacs: removed 3 duplicate functions from notmuch-show.el
[notmuch-archives.git] / b2 / 18ccfb66834d1ba6a2326d79a52c429aae9abb
1 Return-Path: <ethan.glasser.camp@gmail.com>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362C9431FBD\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 14:05:28 -0800 (PST)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
10 X-Spam-Level: \r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
12         tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
13         FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
15         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
16         with ESMTP id iE12I7HBSXSe for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
17         Sun, 18 Nov 2012 14:05:27 -0800 (PST)\r
18 Received: from mail-qa0-f53.google.com (mail-qa0-f53.google.com\r
19         [209.85.216.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
20         (No client certificate requested)\r
21         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD013431FB6\r
22         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 14:05:27 -0800 (PST)\r
23 Received: by mail-qa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id k31so3461756qat.5\r
24         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 14:05:27 -0800 (PST)\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
26         h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id\r
27         :mime-version:content-type;\r
28         bh=tzcI0MlgR1JkaymhNUb8b82M+xZhJToVsNB1kZi8ibo=;\r
29         b=adaeMiqZvMxs0daygI4nIksuOWb77p/s09z82YsuZDaSMt+VMfblId2NqPb3Qkz6Dm\r
30         849cku8iUBdOUwdbTM5KdAblTcpGTk2rNltVVi38NgRcTzxjxnKbVLMUm/we1c32ZECI\r
31         oo64BlKw+nueM+IOtnI2VSYvRlKD41f3RhNWMoid0GXOGij729DsitnjmFwuR/9soaSK\r
32         guX/EWmL2dzSrrGCZoGVZ11QEFhncljum/EVcWjB3/yBdi/TPMg5whDyWmdh4d5ghKDY\r
33         Bhu8WnqvlInLTwlEmkqzU2k6KLYx5Cl3iw0dqyfkphHukuKZ5R073E1jb+TlB+aJN1Rz\r
34         7eWg==\r
35 Received: by 10.224.19.74 with SMTP id z10mr9987633qaa.96.1353276327249;\r
36         Sun, 18 Nov 2012 14:05:27 -0800 (PST)\r
37 Received: from smtp.gmail.com ([66.114.71.21])\r
38         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bc9sm5126490qab.2.2012.11.18.14.05.26\r
39         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
40         Sun, 18 Nov 2012 14:05:26 -0800 (PST)\r
41 From: Ethan Glasser-Camp <ethan.glasser.camp@gmail.com>\r
42 To: Ethan Glasser-Camp <ethan.glasser.camp@gmail.com>, david@tethera.net,\r
43         notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
44 Subject: Re: Add new dump/restore format and batch tagging.\r
45 In-Reply-To: <87obiu1sps.fsf@betacantrips.com>\r
46 References: <1353265498-3839-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net>\r
47         <87obiu1sps.fsf@betacantrips.com>\r
48 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+45~g6ea9330 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.1.1\r
49         (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
50 Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 17:05:24 -0500\r
51 Message-ID: <87lidy1s9n.fsf@betacantrips.com>\r
52 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
53 Content-Type: text/plain\r
54 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
55 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
56 Precedence: list\r
57 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
58         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
59 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
60         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
61 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
62 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
63 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
64 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
65         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
66 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 22:05:28 -0000\r
67 \r
68 Ethan Glasser-Camp <ethan.glasser.camp@gmail.com> writes:\r
69 \r
70 > - Patch 4 still has a subject line that ends in a period. I don't think\r
71 >   this is mandatory for everyone but some people consider it best\r
72 >   practice.\r
73 \r
74 Best practice, of course, would be to remove the period at the end of\r
75 the subject line. Patch 12 also has one.\r
76 \r
77 Ethan\r