b0/45aaeffe1c2a6daaf1c9f6cc7cea16867105ca

   1 Return-Path: <five9a2@gmail.com>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28E9431FAE\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  9 Feb 2010 11:28:17 -0800 (PST)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -0.092\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.092 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
  12         tests=[AWL=-0.093, BAYES_50=0.001] autolearn=unavailable\r
  13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  15         with ESMTP id er7U07VE0TOz for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  16         Tue,  9 Feb 2010 11:28:16 -0800 (PST)\r
  17 Received: from mail-fx0-f217.google.com (mail-fx0-f217.google.com\r
  18         [209.85.220.217])\r
  19         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EBBC431FBD\r
  20         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  9 Feb 2010 11:28:16 -0800 (PST)\r
  21 Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so394176fxm.30\r
  22         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:28:15 -0800 (PST)\r
  23 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
  24         h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:from:to:subject\r
  25         :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;\r
  26         bh=uc9HAvXCDTwtaLHQaSx9qSd9tIxHrsgr4eo6r0wHq8s=;\r
  27         b=gnMwbzV/ZW02B+L5F2ishBDq7L7mlCgM6o59NBrkVoGgbcUZLWcXBiEOS/qPXvc512\r
  28         hohd7FpHF2XDl8dPk25N0NAlub0IzdcKZsdCWaENOYYsUU+SzG7BAdUn/TIL0zPKVJ9w\r
  29         UxcGIHk2vvZmFNmSOcUdyaPBSnPXIHIjZ3naA=\r
  30 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
  31         h=sender:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id\r
  32         :mime-version:content-type;\r
  33         b=ilKFxdRdWmwLoSxZSlc3Mo4lFqPmNiaCW8W3RoB3F+MOkXKmX90bNBoBxxsNmvi8XP\r
  34         TMJMjtZcFsSe7jqvFdzRbl6TzcJQAmON+exTZdlYkLA4lAwYb5cG7U6mOEAE2tC87I/T\r
  35         DFV0n+8vpYx79OtKpaLhmWiiD5d47BAFlFMQ4=\r
  36 Received: by 10.223.14.194 with SMTP id h2mr4049593faa.14.1265743693826;\r
  37         Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:28:13 -0800 (PST)\r
  38 Received: from kunyang (vawpc43.ethz.ch [129.132.59.11])\r
  39         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm769970fkr.57.2010.02.09.11.28.11\r
  40         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);\r
  41         Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:28:12 -0800 (PST)\r
  42 Sender: Jed Brown <five9a2@gmail.com>\r
  43 From: Jed Brown <jed@59A2.org>\r
  44 To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>,\r
  45         notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  46 In-Reply-To: <87ljf2md2d.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
  47 References: <87mxzjpl9v.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
  48         <87eikvpfzl.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
  49         <87r5oua2wv.fsf@steelpick.localdomain>\r
  50         <87ljf2md2d.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
  51 Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:30:17 +0100\r
  52 Message-ID: <87tytqqkae.fsf@59A2.org>\r
  53 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  54 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
  55 Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Switch from random to sequential thread\r
  56  identifiers.\r
  57 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  58 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  59 Precedence: list\r
  60 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  61         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  62 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  63         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  64 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  65 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  66 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  67 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  68         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  69 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:28:18 -0000\r
  70 \r
  71 On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:19:54 -0800, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:\r
  72 > I did verify the above in a copy of WG14/N1124. For anyone that doesn't\r
  73 > recognize that, that's the draft from the C99 working group that I've\r
  74 > been told is remarkably similar to C99 but distinct in that it's freely\r
  75 > available[*]. I haven't verified the similarity, but I have found that\r
  76 > document quite useful in cases like this one.\r
  77 \r
  78 This one is more recent (TC3):\r
  79 \r
  80   http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/WG14/www/docs/n1256.pdf\r
  81 \r
  82 I don't know the legality of this copy:\r
  83 \r
  84   http://www.ishiboo.com/~danny/c++/C_STANDARD-ISOIEC9899-1999.pdf\r
  85 \r
  86 \r
  87 Jed\r