[PATCH 0/4] configure: fix some shellcheck warnings

[notmuch-archives.git] / ab / 72f77ad8c5dacf86fcc2c009b90d7e752a35e9

Return-Path: <jani@nikula.org>\r
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A971B6DE0B29\r
 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:24:39 -0700 (PDT)\r
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
X-Spam-Score: 0.145\r
X-Spam-Level: \r
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.145 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.865, \r
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01,\r
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
 by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
 with ESMTP id 875qLH45_8IU for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
 Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:24:36 -0700 (PDT)\r
Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com (mail-wi0-f169.google.com\r
 [209.85.212.169])\r
 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BEB16DE0948\r
 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:24:35 -0700 (PDT)\r
Received: by wibdq8 with SMTP id dq8so14740848wib.1\r
 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:24:31 -0700 (PDT)\r
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;\r
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references\r
 :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type\r
 :content-transfer-encoding;\r
 bh=gYlgoq/T9/n3eKwEFZYqfvAzKnpmnTRfO5rTfJZ1ieA=;\r
 b=ISndxXEj7UNQjI7+e9VvUdMgEGww28a/rjLn/PTwFK/GTNA3N4+llQlA1eiqkfswZw\r
 mSYsOPiAhCH/qTnwwKnm0er2Dts+SCs0VC1lFIrjnkwZ2uViRyosD0pnBT/WikUui1zR\r
 WfIdkc/KqR3jD5/3db1I5lX46G9v18SIiA6j2h3QAfvipBY3V898fSEY2EZebIEf4XkX\r
 X2b+ZHO+YPCCJC4Jqk3Yq0elU+WF0GgIpghLPZit1a3I4kO4+IIidtwaSKDX+hr5GA0B\r
 QB8U569gvmj7BDUfyXDzO0WENrKAVxCO6rOlCpFYVxhg/y8FDtGa59qMYF2+t0y3hoHS\r
 hEQg==\r
X-Gm-Message-State:\r
 ALoCoQnG7iURG2k2AWwKU3UqoAV3Uc5fF+0z1JFJvPOf4m4QNq00Z071rETVu+ZciYNYnKPru1q8\r
X-Received: by 10.180.76.208 with SMTP id m16mr32288448wiw.39.1434043471582;\r
 Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:24:31 -0700 (PDT)\r
Received: from localhost (mobile-access-bcee6b-244.dhcp.inet.fi.\r
 [188.238.107.244])\r
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id be3sm2582038wib.21.2015.06.11.10.24.29\r
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);\r
 Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:24:30 -0700 (PDT)\r
From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
To: Robert =?utf-8?Q?K=C3=BCnnemann?= <robert@kunnemann.de>,\r
 notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
Subject: Re: Syntactic sugar for range syntax\r
In-Reply-To: <20150610153833.GA19301@peachum.local>\r
References: <20150610153833.GA19301@peachum.local>\r
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.19+86~gbed8b67 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1\r
 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 20:24:36 +0300\r
Message-ID: <87h9qejgyz.fsf@nikula.org>\r
MIME-Version: 1.0\r
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18\r
Precedence: list\r
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 17:24:39 -0000\r
\r
On Wed, 10 Jun 2015, Robert K=C3=BCnnemann <robert@kunnemann.de> wrote:\r
> I've been using notmuch for about a year now (using mutt-kz) and I am\r
> very happy with it. I have, however, a small suggestion about the range\r
> syntax in search queries. Often, I am looking for emails that have\r
> occurred, say, in the last week. The query has the following form:\r
>\r
>  date:today-1week..today\r
\r
In other words, date:1w..\r
\r
The reference for relative dates is "now" if one is not specified. The\r
minus sign means nothing, relative dates all refer to the past and are\r
added together.\r
\r
> The following syntactic sugar could shorten this kind of queries:\r
>=20=20\r
>  date:r -> date:r..today, if r is a relative date\r
\r
You can use open ended queries date:since.. or date:..until to not limit\r
the end or start time.\r
\r
>  date:a -> date:a..a, if a is an absolute date\r
\r
This needs support from Xapian, but we've discussed this in the past and\r
agree on the semantics. There's a patch to make date:a..! mean the same\r
in the mean time:\r
\r
http://mid.gmane.org/1425732959-2282-1-git-send-email-jani@nikula.org\r
\r
>  date:a-r -> date:a-r..a, for combination.\r
\r
I think this conflicts with the above.\r
\r
> (If r is interpreted as today-r, the first two transformations are\r
> subsumed by the last.)\r
>\r
> For example:\r
>  date:today -> date:today..today\r
>  date:-1week -> date:-1week..today\r
\r
date:1w..\r
\r
>  date:24.12.2014-4w -> date:24.12.2014-4w..24.12.2014=20\r
>\r
> What do you think about this suggestion? Is this something notmuch would\r
> do, or rather something for xapian?\r
\r
What we can do in notmuch is pretty limited unless we write a full blown\r
custom query parser. Basically Xapian parses date: and .., and passes us\r
the rest to figure out.\r
\r
\r
HTH,\r
Jani.\r
\r
\r
>\r
> With kind regards, Robert K=C3=BCnnemann\r
> _______________________________________________\r
> notmuch mailing list\r
> notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch\r