a8/2d29fde355124306a71381a009b3b65afa9ed8

   1 Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A7944151F3\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun,  8 Jan 2012 15:32:21 -0800 (PST)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
  12         tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
  13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  15         with ESMTP id sGDnvFVEr1BA for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  16         Sun,  8 Jan 2012 15:32:21 -0800 (PST)\r
  17 Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
  18         [131.215.239.19])\r
  19         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89354151C0\r
  20         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun,  8 Jan 2012 15:32:20 -0800 (PST)\r
  21 Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
  22         by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A1C66E00E2;\r
  23         Sun,  8 Jan 2012 15:32:18 -0800 (PST)\r
  24 X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new\r
  25 Received: from finestructure.net (cpe-76-174-137-84.socal.res.rr.com\r
  26         [76.174.137.84]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins)\r
  27         by earth-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6837F66E00C7;\r
  28         Sun,  8 Jan 2012 15:32:14 -0800 (PST)\r
  29 Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
  30         id 08C02A4A; Sun,  8 Jan 2012 15:32:14 -0800 (PST)\r
  31 From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
  32 To: Jeremy Nickurak <not-much@trk.nickurak.ca>, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
  33 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] emacs: bind 'r' to reply-to-sender and 'R' to\r
  34         reply-to-all\r
  35 In-Reply-To:\r
  36  <CA+eQo_3kr3L8Nuz3pOTeUfT-Gi2i46yV-Odgo3gmTyOmEi+mTg@mail.gmail.com>\r
  37 References: <cover.1325794371.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
  38         <cover.1326058946.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
  39         <f2c641e47bed1bb76def7ffaed25143071ee7713.1326058946.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
  40         <CA+eQo_3kr3L8Nuz3pOTeUfT-Gi2i46yV-Odgo3gmTyOmEi+mTg@mail.gmail.com>\r
  41 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+168~g34b8bac (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
  42         (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
  43 Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 15:32:11 -0800\r
  44 Message-ID: <87pqetrcsk.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
  45 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  46 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
  47         micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
  48 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  49 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  50 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  51 Precedence: list\r
  52 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  53         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  54 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  55         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  56 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  57 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  58 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  59 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  60         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  61 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 23:32:21 -0000\r
  62 \r
  63 --=-=-=\r
  64 \r
  65 On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 15:01:30 -0700, Jeremy Nickurak <not-much@trk.nickurak.ca> wrote:\r
  66 > FWIW, I generally prefer reply-all as the default. In my experience,\r
  67 > when a message is sent to a bunch of people, it's usually treated as a\r
  68 > "forum" discussion where everybody wants to be in on everything. Also,\r
  69 > once you've started composing, it's much easier to delete people you\r
  70 > don't want included than to add people who are no longer referenced in\r
  71 > the new buffer at all.\r
  72 \r
  73 That's a good point.  I think that maybe people are wanting to protect\r
  74 against the accidental reply to all when you only mean to reply to the\r
  75 sender.\r
  76 \r
  77 jamie.\r
  78 \r
  79 --=-=-=\r
  80 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
  81 \r
  82 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
  83 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
  84 \r
  85 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPCid7AAoJEO00zqvie6q89TsP/17ECLjswAkcKCVNsI8ZXjfK\r
  86 fXlwhzlHGfNNwcAuW6nDDBlK3UrZWvUeJ8KLqpm5tAo/3n5OEcyJ7WUcXCtgtwFi\r
  87 P7T+PBQe/rVorJqq5UYTCSl4HN9V0IssoEMgkze3iTGJ2f70AstCRABQRTvCJkjn\r
  88 euiXLAYignFy7cnP+HcOCAbQ7ZdAqsx5F89kl0bHnCjK3CjAXUCWatVeaUTrPNfp\r
  89 eHAHmtVPbpjjI1BIgPz+oclXgTQuEKfH1fPGk/MYaIdDgDZxcucSbH1rXmAdYBbI\r
  90 reBFu/sDc+TLxwGeCXDYeqHK0vaMWeOKkBq5h/eMCCtpbe0CvAy0ShLbLLp7iJzt\r
  91 babIzst+iwusrowKCiWKgxOE1Tdqjv8ncpEd+9jWcUPhpXMMHXgSjXBd2xQwIfEg\r
  92 BNTR6Jy8Jfcw52Dz546vrokQCxPTLLEenZsWTVo+BQZMU2nP28aC+cmksnszETIz\r
  93 /8XcBpT3SZ7luL+laqLJa0KvPTIDM5Tw3UjKSuT/sbdz3QBKgliKP/+qmYCmIwXb\r
  94 ZxFdfka2hgVlf6T5OPOgoq/ZORIbZyvv3G4tObp0lxoR/e+UMNxsvi/FWRjrWvku\r
  95 daWjRRvysj9GsKPJdLG/1bGNCVCmdKixKTeLGItcWpeaF5tjF1etwsk4yRs7K2Fj\r
  96 vZ6pbAptY8o8SyY8FutL\r
  97 =LIwf\r
  98 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
  99 --=-=-=--\r