1 Return-Path: <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2914431FAF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 02:10:19 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id XrSc7JY5z2wT for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Wed, 28 Nov 2012 02:10:19 -0800 (PST)
\r
18 Received: from mail-vc0-f181.google.com (mail-vc0-f181.google.com
\r
19 [209.85.220.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87FE1431FAE
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 02:10:19 -0800 (PST)
\r
23 Received: by mail-vc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id fy27so8716916vcb.26
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 02:10:18 -0800 (PST)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
\r
26 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
\r
28 bh=dczC28Ohi81dmISWvxWQyY6FMzVPwBmT4YFiRjy6xMo=;
\r
29 b=xI+jyCfjpSo/xFk9gVowYJ3IWP8oGGk0g/mJYNtgjzrhtOw8+edhbSLyaJdWvcgfrZ
\r
30 VQWArqYsZChlXsOxv7qPgeZoLyEk6U+Y/L5nux+v9Zn2sKYMBYbWmHsTTH9uGfOvBCus
\r
31 EFTDB4L+vmgdF1ATuG+40qzWOW+pmcb/i2wE32Hl6niQy5QePeJkBsGa12v80o8rhj/2
\r
32 3TB8d98471kkzKkJ/BJHpX+OafB/MnRyiu6dNj7VMnYQXrvH3PZFv39lhD3A5N79LxoH
\r
33 fGEBtI13q9fz87seBl37oCX1sMXdfZLJ6qXhq8WprQrXJNUjtBwYIUkBFcUBF2p2OzLH
\r
36 Received: by 10.52.66.144 with SMTP id f16mr4095885vdt.60.1354097417883; Wed,
\r
37 28 Nov 2012 02:10:17 -0800 (PST)
\r
38 Received: by 10.58.34.51 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 02:10:17 -0800 (PST)
\r
39 In-Reply-To: <50B5BDFF.1080802@gmail.com>
\r
40 References: <k8vn08$62g$2@ger.gmane.org> <87zk24ctko.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca>
\r
41 <50B3871B.2050509@gmail.com> <87r4ngcl00.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca>
\r
42 <50B48627.9040409@gmail.com> <xa1tfw3vugkf.fsf@mina86.com>
\r
43 <CAGhLh6Fhxq=bFHVPfVaMg0dXLgF3VEr-nBh62CbBAW7arwsM9Q@mail.gmail.com>
\r
44 <xa1t8v9mvogd.fsf@mina86.com>
\r
45 <CAGhLh6HKLwFbyfp8AfYLJuhhCxQUCpZ4F8nfJ6q1WmBZVOZSuQ@mail.gmail.com>
\r
46 <xa1t38zuvmqb.fsf@mina86.com> <50B5BDFF.1080802@gmail.com>
\r
47 Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:10:17 +0100
\r
49 <CAMP44s26iY8eKDLCeLe-jO9Y+AY-+NnS+UZeUMQnLxNniL9xqg@mail.gmail.com>
\r
50 Subject: Re: gmail label support patch available for oflineimap
\r
51 From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
\r
53 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
\r
54 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
55 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
56 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
58 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
59 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
60 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
61 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
62 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
63 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
64 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
65 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
66 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
67 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:10:20 -0000
\r
69 On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Rainer M Krug <r.m.krug@gmail.com> wrote:
\r
71 >> I just want to say that having notmuch communicate with Gmail is terrible idea, since this
\r
72 >> would mean duplicating of jobs that offlineimap and notmuch do.
\r
74 > My sentiments, notmuch is doing realy good what it is doing, and adding gmail / other server
\r
75 > communication is not the best idea.
\r
79 >> I could see some *other* tool, besides notmuch and offlineimap, which connects to Gmail to
\r
80 >> fetch the tags, but that would again duplicate a lot of the code from offlineimap.
\r
82 > I also agree here - offlineimap already has a repository type Gmail, and if gmails imap
\r
83 > extensions, particularly
\r
84 > https://developers.google.com/google-apps/gmail/imap_extensions#access_to_gmail_labels_x-gm-labels
\r
85 > is used, it should be not to difficult to read the labels and to store them in e.g. a sqlite
\r
86 > database for each message id. This could then be written back as well, and only the [GMAIL] folder
\r
87 > would have to be synchronised, i.e. no duplication.
\r
89 Not everybody uses offlineimap.
\r