a6/46052c0b5b0e5813769a58510a2cd6bc2858d5

   1 Return-Path: <novalazy@gmail.com>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E003431FAF\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  6 Mar 2013 03:09:08 -0800 (PST)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: 0.602\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
  12         tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,\r
  13         FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7]\r
  14         autolearn=disabled\r
  15 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  16         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  17         with ESMTP id DLEd1qZSJrvi for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  18         Wed,  6 Mar 2013 03:08:58 -0800 (PST)\r
  19 Received: from mail-ia0-f174.google.com (mail-ia0-f174.google.com\r
  20         [209.85.210.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
  21         (No client certificate requested)\r
  22         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E15A5431FAE\r
  23         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  6 Mar 2013 03:08:57 -0800 (PST)\r
  24 Received: by mail-ia0-f174.google.com with SMTP id u20so7148990iag.5\r
  25         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 03:08:56 -0800 (PST)\r
  26 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
  27         h=x-received:date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to\r
  28         :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition\r
  29         :content-transfer-encoding;\r
  30         bh=6Hltio5o8RaabGKtmD/OHBurA5A2U2XNCVaKZ06EdRY=;\r
  31         b=kUiSS+V84f6N01t11ckF5avHoIz7OfwWLkB9RPD+f9fXA3CRYr9m1jRtyEhiCf8hgK\r
  32         5IzRIKgmXrcBmr80VjFCy9ysuZ+RS5Y3u7wxa8+HOcC1PJF+3rC/ydvbRdTji0MiG1wK\r
  33         /mFva7MtA1IvRqf5kDFuFlBs6G5/ny0hR9i2eq1PqG0f40PNsHzegNFtCFdPMnMD5V2T\r
  34         pLlJhGkRnec2Mc46adFieHX7gVwatAchIauWa0scgDepf808OIic0RGcXvFHhfZ2M/TJ\r
  35         pcdDkBOdtcyIYxGpcWrGsmUhzzNjV6W1pPW049ZW+jU9ytV1h1uLbuIFYJivgHy94RlM\r
  36         yHEw==\r
  37 X-Received: by 10.50.154.129 with SMTP id vo1mr10127419igb.93.1362568136411;\r
  38         Wed, 06 Mar 2013 03:08:56 -0800 (PST)\r
  39 Received: from localhost (215.42.233.220.static.exetel.com.au.\r
  40         [220.233.42.215])\r
  41         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id uq1sm21505480igc.5.2013.03.06.03.08.53\r
  42         (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);\r
  43         Wed, 06 Mar 2013 03:08:55 -0800 (PST)\r
  44 Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 22:08:49 +1100\r
  45 Message-ID: <20130306220849.GB5730@hili.localdomain>\r
  46 From: Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com>\r
  47 To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
  48 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] cli: support Mail-Followup-To: in notmuch reply\r
  49 In-Reply-To: <871ubwdcy7.fsf@nikula.org>\r
  50 References:\r
  51  <5eaa3acc22ee5513bdce5ab931b7a79ade880e06.1362254104.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
  52         <f9c7258be72bec0b174553db0410c29eba2745fa.1362254104.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
  53         <20130303120745.GA4884@hili.localdomain>        <871ubwdcy7.fsf@nikula.org>\r
  54 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  55 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
  56 Content-Disposition: inline\r
  57 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\r
  58 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  59 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  60 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  61 Precedence: list\r
  62 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  63         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  64 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  65         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  66 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  67 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  68 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  69 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  70         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  71 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 11:09:08 -0000\r
  72 \r
  73 On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 11:56:00 +0200, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:\r
  74 > I have added the reply.honor_followup_to configuration because, although\r
  75 > widely used, it's not a standard, and therefore some people might not\r
  76 > like to respect that. Although I'd argue if the sender of the message\r
  77 > has added that header, it's the sender's wish it should be respected.\r
  78 > \r
  79 > If people think our reply-all should always and unconditionally respect\r
  80 > Mail-Followup-To if it's present, I'd be happy to throw out the config\r
  81 > option. It's ugly.\r
  82 \r
  83 How about making it it optional on the command-line rather than through\r
  84 configuration?  Then you don't lose the functionality where you can\r
  85 initiate a reply to all visible From/To/Cc addresses (ready for pruning),\r
  86 regardless of the value of some header you probably don't even see, even\r
  87 if typically you *do* want to respect that header.\r
  88 \r
  89 (Bringing us back to the three reply functions.)\r
  90 \r
  91 Peter\r