a5/220bac0b86d7430190640ebbacea735a9700c1

   1 Return-Path: <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D0BB42119B\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 20:04:26 -0700 (PDT)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -0.8\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
  12         tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
  13         RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
  14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  15         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  16         with ESMTP id CQxQB29K1A8c for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  17         Wed, 29 Jun 2011 20:04:25 -0700 (PDT)\r
  18 Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com (mail-bw0-f53.google.com\r
  19         [209.85.214.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
  20         (No client certificate requested)\r
  21         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26DF7421192\r
  22         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 20:04:25 -0700 (PDT)\r
  23 Received: by bwg12 with SMTP id 12so1703987bwg.26\r
  24         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 20:04:23 -0700 (PDT)\r
  25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
  26         d=microcomaustralia.com.au; s=google;\r
  27         h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date\r
  28         :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;\r
  29         bh=UVNCHezOOvMDquV3CZ9SOafGQVyFYzjLOw3R0zgMGnM=;\r
  30         b=M1UaF9/YqqL/L5Cz4IaDl3TOX8geir1mJFW5NTgroQ7r47VENdq0mAOzPd86p577fc\r
  31         W1qJe2Jz0mclWHaDZZsWEynLhudSygo+GbhHk8JKPTOYhgv48Dbg2EREXItYaFHgRfx+\r
  32         lzvwXL9ULY/9u1ufrevFq7uZsegIwJCxTs+Cs=\r
  33 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  34 Received: by 10.205.65.4 with SMTP id xk4mr1476099bkb.21.1309403063572; Wed,\r
  35         29 Jun 2011 20:04:23 -0700 (PDT)\r
  36 Received: by 10.204.63.144 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 20:04:23 -0700 (PDT)\r
  37 X-Originating-IP: [202.158.218.252]\r
  38 In-Reply-To: <87fwms45xz.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
  39 References: <86iproe86u.fsf@greenrd.plus.com>\r
  40         <87fwms45xz.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
  41 Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:04:23 +1000\r
  42 Message-ID: <BANLkTi=StMS67+UwQbm8cUH3yNr_ySrN5A@mail.gmail.com>\r
  43 Subject: Re: Preventing the user shooting themself in the foot\r
  44 From: Brian May <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au>\r
  45 To: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  46 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1\r
  47 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  48 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  49 Precedence: list\r
  50 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  51         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  52 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  53         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  54 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  55 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  56 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  57 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  58         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  59 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 03:04:26 -0000\r
  60 \r
  61 On 30 June 2011 08:40, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:\r
  62 > The 'a' keybinding, (in turn), was designed for cases when you *know*\r
  63 > you don't want to read the rest of the thread.\r
  64 \r
  65 ... in which case it should also mark everything as read. IMHO.\r
  66 \r
  67 Are there any keyboard bindings to go forwards to the next message or\r
  68 backwards to the last message without marking anything as archived?\r
  69 \r
  70 Also, just something I have noticed it isn't really obvious that a\r
  71 thread has replies without scrolling down, and that takes time. Would\r
  72 be really good if there could be some big/highlighted visual indicator\r
  73 that there are still unread messages further down.\r
  74 -- \r
  75 Brian May <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au>\r