1 Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB9B94196F2
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 03:03:00 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.308 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=1.592] autolearn=no
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id E18EWRM9E5aa for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Sat, 24 Apr 2010 03:03:00 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com
\r
19 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A58431FC1
\r
20 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 03:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
\r
21 Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so1938160wyf.26
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 03:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
\r
23 Received: by 10.216.154.145 with SMTP id h17mr1593239wek.103.1272103378974;
\r
24 Sat, 24 Apr 2010 03:02:58 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 Received: from ut.hh.sledj.net (host83-217-165-81.dsl.vispa.com
\r
27 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x1sm3008888wbx.1.2010.04.24.03.02.56
\r
28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
\r
29 Sat, 24 Apr 2010 03:02:57 -0700 (PDT)
\r
30 Received: by ut.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
\r
31 id 45763594135; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 06:52:33 +0100 (BST)
\r
32 To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
33 Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: Re-arrange message sending code
\r
34 In-Reply-To: <87pr1pvrv1.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
35 References: <1271927012-10062-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>
\r
36 <87pr1pvrv1.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
37 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2-20-g89ec2c1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1
\r
38 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
39 From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
\r
40 Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 06:52:33 +0100
\r
41 Message-ID: <87ljcdcs7y.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net>
\r
43 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
44 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
45 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
47 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
48 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
49 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
50 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
51 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
52 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
53 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
54 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
55 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
56 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 10:03:01 -0000
\r
58 On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:25:22 -0700, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:
\r
59 > And I'm hoping that this new support makes it easier for people to hook
\r
60 > in the Fcc code. Does this mean there's now a single place to add that
\r
61 > that will make it work for messages composed from 'm', 'f', or 'r'?
\r
65 > The one unpleasantry I've noticed is that in the case of 'm' the headers
\r
66 > are being put into the buffer in the following order:
\r
73 > where I would prefer them in the following order:
\r
82 (setq message-hidden-headers
\r
83 '("^References:" "^Face:" "^X-Face:" "^X-Draft-From:" "^User-Agent:"))
\r
85 so the User-Agent is not even visible.
\r
89 David Edmondson, http://dme.org
\r