9d/b3d4f7a3da87aac360d854f3cd33dbce42ee9b

   1 Return-Path: <novalazy@gmail.com>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE1D431FAF\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 22:15:56 -0700 (PDT)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
  12         tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
  13         FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
  14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  15         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  16         with ESMTP id eiUCUaYWHs7Z for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  17         Fri, 26 Jul 2013 22:15:50 -0700 (PDT)\r
  18 Received: from mail-pa0-f45.google.com (mail-pa0-f45.google.com\r
  19         [209.85.220.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
  20         (No client certificate requested)\r
  21         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BF59431FAE\r
  22         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 22:15:50 -0700 (PDT)\r
  23 Received: by mail-pa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id bg4so3968263pad.32\r
  24         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 22:15:49 -0700 (PDT)\r
  25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
  26         h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references\r
  27         :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition\r
  28         :content-transfer-encoding;\r
  29         bh=NmEEzZzb4J7NPcEaFchAlqRVdCCIymoDRMKd/LYIn8Y=;\r
  30         b=VxcrzMjeSZoLm/B2AZ8B7wvh6R4M8BI5FolhvepRGXfFMftiFJ0SnmIhV0Lh2GQgwj\r
  31         InuUh/VmzFWVKwG3z77iQUIYKAuKQFEUG2xpcCOBR0ZXNWckeeBy6WNl6k0wV7/8n8oE\r
  32         qRIeQxfYqXod/jAg4ZzASrz93aGO3tLlnT5QFz4HhlBVqykr539juYL3Tsg8iUaM4C73\r
  33         s9z2bdZdRV7jTq/vWQYQhDcQl9L+Q/02Cq0+XyuoW8BHmU5x+6C6VBG/JGsTqYo3ROjt\r
  34         o9c//t0DcpTfGkT5/Nxf44P5+TyTrWZFI1ARLhGvVYXqysYR0jbrIGj2LIicBeYQS/vo\r
  35         UcOA==\r
  36 X-Received: by 10.66.139.227 with SMTP id rb3mr58655066pab.121.1374902149707; \r
  37         Fri, 26 Jul 2013 22:15:49 -0700 (PDT)\r
  38 Received: from localhost (215.42.233.220.static.exetel.com.au.\r
  39         [220.233.42.215])\r
  40         by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 7sm7277904paf.22.2013.07.26.22.15.47\r
  41         for <multiple recipients>\r
  42         (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);\r
  43         Fri, 26 Jul 2013 22:15:48 -0700 (PDT)\r
  44 Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 15:15:10 +1000\r
  45 Message-ID: <20130727151510.GA13750@hili.localdomain>\r
  46 From: Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com>\r
  47 To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
  48 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] cli: add insert --must-index option\r
  49 In-Reply-To: <87ip048gbj.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
  50 References: <1374365254-13227-1-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com>\r
  51         <87ip048gbj.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
  52 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  53 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
  54 Content-Disposition: inline\r
  55 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\r
  56 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  57 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  58 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  59 Precedence: list\r
  60 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  61         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  62 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  63         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  64 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  65 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  66 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  67 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  68         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  69 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 05:15:56 -0000\r
  70 \r
  71 On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 09:31:28 +0100, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:\r
  72 > \r
  73 > Do you have a particular use case where indexing is required but tagging\r
  74 > is not? For my uses I would prefer failing if either indexing or tagging\r
  75 > failed. (My use being postponing messages; If they don't get the\r
  76 > postponed tag they could be hard to find)\r
  77 \r
  78 You're right.\r
  79 \r
  80 What about a failure to sync tags to maildir flags?\r
  81 \r
  82 I now noticed that database modifications aren't flushed until the\r
  83 notmuch_database_destroy call (right?), which has no return value and\r
  84 failure of which is silently ignored.  That's acceptable in the default\r
  85 mode, but with --must-index the failure should be reported (and the\r
  86 file deleted).\r
  87 \r
  88 Peter\r