9d/ae0387c2215110c1ed7470a2f194da7d486f9f

   1 Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@nixu.com>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E628431FD0\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:53:35 -0700 (PDT)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: 0\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
  12         autolearn=disabled\r
  13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  15         with ESMTP id ZC+vIUcsc8kC for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  16         Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:53:35 -0700 (PDT)\r
  17 Received: from taco2.nixu.fi (taco2.nixu.fi [194.197.118.31])\r
  18         (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
  19         (No client certificate requested)\r
  20         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0C88431FB6\r
  21         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:53:34 -0700 (PDT)\r
  22 Received: from taco2.nixu.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
  23         by taco2.nixu.fi (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id\r
  24         p7NGrWli008656\r
  25         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)\r
  26         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 19:53:32 +0300\r
  27 Received: (from too@localhost)\r
  28         by taco2.nixu.fi (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id p7NGrWLI008655;\r
  29         Tue, 23 Aug 2011 19:53:32 +0300\r
  30 X-Authentication-Warning: taco2.nixu.fi: too set sender to\r
  31         tomi.ollila@nixu.com using -f\r
  32 From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@nixu.com>\r
  33 To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  34 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] add user friendly date range search\r
  35 References: <cover.1312964528.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
  36         <87bovryqp0.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>\r
  37         <20110823163908.GD2968@lemote.jasonwoof.com>\r
  38 X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL\r
  39         $[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F\r
  40         !)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z\r
  41 Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 19:53:32 +0300\r
  42 In-Reply-To: <20110823163908.GD2968@lemote.jasonwoof.com> (Jason Woofenden's\r
  43         message of "Tue, 23 Aug 2011 12:39:09 -0400")\r
  44 Message-ID: <yf6sjoscbn7.fsf@taco2.nixu.fi>\r
  45 User-Agent: Gnus/5.110014 (No Gnus v0.14) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux)\r
  46 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  47 Content-Type: text/plain\r
  48 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  49 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  50 Precedence: list\r
  51 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  52         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  53 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  54         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  55 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  56 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  57 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  58 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  59         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  60 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 16:53:35 -0000\r
  61 \r
  62 On Tue 23 Aug 2011 19:39, Jason Woofenden <jason@jasonwoof.com> writes:\r
  63 \r
  64 > Here's my thoughts on date/range syntax:\r
  65 >\r
  66 > I think: date:monday should show only e-mails that arrived on\r
  67 > monday (not also emails that arrived since then.) Because that's\r
  68 > what it looks like it does.\r
  69 >\r
  70 > I think a very common use of date ranges will be from some time\r
  71 > until now. So I'd like that to be easy. I suggest this syntax:\r
  72 >\r
  73 >       since:monday\r
  74 >\r
  75 > which would be a shorthand for:\r
  76 >\r
  77 >       date:monday-00:00:00..now\r
  78 >\r
  79 > If that's not a popular idea, then we should at least be able to\r
  80 > use this shorthand for the same:\r
  81 >\r
  82 >       date:monday..\r
  83 \r
  84 This is better, so that us who speaks other languages than English\r
  85 natively doesn't need to learn (think in) so many english words >;)\r
  86 \r
  87 So, date:mon[day], date:..mon and date:monday.. would be\r
  88 something I liked best.\r
  89 \r
  90 > Also, I think it's quite valuable to have "yesterday" work as a\r
  91 > date.\r
  92 \r
  93 I agree.\r
  94 \r
  95 >\r
  96 > That's all.\r
  97 >\r
  98 >          - Jason\r
  99 \r
 100 Tomi\r