1 Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80375431FC0
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 14:55:08 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id 7dfDXqyvj055 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Wed, 5 Feb 2014 14:55:02 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D372431FAE
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 14:55:02 -0800 (PST)
\r
20 Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1])
\r
21 by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B7E100033;
\r
22 Thu, 6 Feb 2014 00:54:56 +0200 (EET)
\r
23 From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
\r
24 To: "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us>
\r
25 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] nmbug-status: Python-3-compabitility and general
\r
27 In-Reply-To: <20140205152738.GJ14197@odin.tremily.us>
\r
28 References: <cover.1391424512.git.wking@tremily.us>
\r
29 <m2ha8frjgg.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
30 <20140204005331.GQ14197@odin.tremily.us>
\r
31 <m2fvnzp3uh.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
32 <20140204161142.GS14197@odin.tremily.us>
\r
33 <m2a9e6zppp.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
34 <20140204191453.GV14197@odin.tremily.us>
\r
35 <m2fvnywsly.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
36 <m2fvnxvc2q.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
37 <20140205152738.GJ14197@odin.tremily.us>
\r
38 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+69~g761b031 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1
\r
39 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
\r
40 X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL
\r
41 $[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F
\r
42 !)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z
\r
43 Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 00:54:56 +0200
\r
44 Message-ID: <m28utp6ugv.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
46 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
47 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
48 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
49 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
51 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
52 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
53 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
54 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
55 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
56 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
57 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
58 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
59 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
60 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 22:55:08 -0000
\r
62 On Wed, Feb 05 2014, "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> wrote:
\r
64 > On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 05:00:45PM +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
\r
65 >> After I fixed the wrapper the program works fine on python 2.6.6.
\r
69 >> now every other thread is background-colored (girly) pink (fef?)
\r
70 >> and every other light blue (eff). for me the light blue is not
\r
71 >> visible (there are no body background color set?)
\r
73 > #EFF is visible to me, but it is light.
\r
75 >> #DFF for the light-blue works better for me.
\r
77 > I'm fine with that. As I said in my cover letter, I'm happy to have
\r
78 > alternative color schemes suggested. Does anyone else want to chime
\r
79 > in on better defaults? This should probably also be configurable via
\r
80 > status-config.json. Maybe:
\r
82 > { "style": {"html": {"thread-colors": ["#DFF", "#FEF"]}}}
\r
84 Maybe we can persuade David to test-run new notmuch-status in
\r
85 his production server before it is pushed to notmuch master, and
\r
86 bikeshed the style in http://nmbug.tethera.net/status/
\r
90 probably no-one is interested to configure those later (if we even
\r
91 get bikeshed comments... ;)
\r
95 >> I think rounded corners are nice but IMHO the round radius is too
\r
96 >> big -- using 0.5mm for the radius would IMHO be better.
\r