Re: [PATCH 0/4] Allow specifying alternate names for addresses in other_email
[notmuch-archives.git] / 98 / f54c3d6198fe96105cb7504ec40a72400fb6db
1 Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C68429E26\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:36:00 -0800 (PST)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
10 X-Spam-Level: \r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
12         tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
15         with ESMTP id 8m13v3bKuB+s for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
16         Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:36:00 -0800 (PST)\r
17 Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
18         [131.215.239.19])\r
19         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC42429E25\r
20         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:36:00 -0800 (PST)\r
21 Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
22         by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD5366E0024;\r
23         Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:35:59 -0800 (PST)\r
24 X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new\r
25 Received: from finestructure.net (gwave-212.ligo.caltech.edu\r
26  [131.215.114.212])     (Authenticated sender: jrollins)        by earth-doxen-submit\r
27  (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD7D66E00D3;  Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:35:55 -0800 (PST)\r
28 Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
29         id C904A38C; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:35:55 -0500 (EST)\r
30 From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
31 To: Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>,\r
32         David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
33 Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: optionally print subtest number\r
34 In-Reply-To: <87hb14ukbc.fsf@gmail.com>\r
35 References: <1323806207-31888-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net>\r
36         <87zkew2jtu.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
37         <87d3bsjc1z.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87hb14ukbc.fsf@gmail.com>\r
38 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+93~ga124635 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
39         (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
40 Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:35:53 -0800\r
41 Message-ID: <87pqfs2gfa.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
42 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
43 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
44         micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
45 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
46 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
47 Precedence: list\r
48 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
49         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
50 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
51         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
52 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
53 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
54 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
55 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
56         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
57 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 23:36:00 -0000\r
58 \r
59 --=-=-=\r
60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
61 \r
62 On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 03:24:23 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmai=\r
63 l.com> wrote:\r
64 > BTW I have some plans to introduce optional explicit test ids that can\r
65 > be used for inter-test dependencies.  E.g.:\r
66 >=20\r
67 >   test_begin_subtest test-id-1 "A subtest"\r
68 >   ....\r
69 >   ;; in another test requre that test-id-1 passed\r
70 >   test_require_subtest test-id-1\r
71 \r
72 Would the required test need to be listed twice, both on the\r
73 begin_subtest line *and* in the require_subtest line?\r
74 \r
75 And again, why would the test id have to be any different that the\r
76 existing test names?  The tests already have names, so I don't\r
77 understand why we would want to introduce some other kind of\r
78 identification.  Seems like it's just going to add extra confusion.\r
79 \r
80 And speaking of which, I sometimes worry that the test infrastructure\r
81 itself is getting too complicated.  Pretty soon we're going to need\r
82 tests for the tests.  I don't necessarily see the need to all of these\r
83 extra features in the test suite, so I worry that it's just making\r
84 everything harder to debug.\r
85 \r
86 jamie.\r
87 \r
88 --=-=-=\r
89 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
90 \r
91 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
92 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
93 \r
94 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJO5+FZAAoJEO00zqvie6q8lhoP/jhjExA5NfqGXGNEuud6+EiH\r
95 X4UAMav/6kwZYJHV8meAm9QQOsUDUW9gVQY0zrcslu2A+NqWt57eKafCHkQW1yDU\r
96 1C63XDlR9pelN2HdFhyzPlfXBTn++MfANZQ+QqXb+y+v1htem3GKszbXIXxPOjn2\r
97 A1kjYYSvJAhxYpQ/UrRSGUc4MaCbLRylggRDoqonrGtZCi7hKQh6QErPt1J/iPp3\r
98 7dEV71sjQsTfl27OUEGnWIdFKUDRRodqyiV6lbeI2xLNcsKAmXyiI4v31PGs2aH2\r
99 3XwpegitBN34Q+GBg/EfAIRyowrdluBCBx9cyB1VMDQF/VLnmjWWngVUwN5x8H55\r
100 RjUfu/ze6g8FOiSEzzODF9g8YwQefy00lGs+JUaNgVcCFI1mivdrQcPsE1jV2Pb9\r
101 cKcfa+9Mc07+aYgAM1FyiIbnWVgl12kLknW5UYviVpQTb4CsninYeMog2YbZg7Ar\r
102 EZnoGpN7fzWAsvNd/Usy6dZGPZ2FBgFOajUC54J1Z1VDjFNpjfgG2teFhiNU3aiG\r
103 tW0TUOxQh1fzDrqsjHiaMAuBfNGYOcJr0+UsXG7mKbe/O6WuTyNEyKi55ph11Xj+\r
104 0ml6DBBbaqSrqVG5JTfxG1y+9DTd/58LSCscO46sE1vL3B6fRaBH3/x3mV117bo+\r
105 3VKbP0Wd4AzVf7lvcFju\r
106 =PfdM\r
107 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
108 --=-=-=--\r