1 Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C68429E26
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:36:00 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id 8m13v3bKuB+s for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:36:00 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu
\r
19 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC42429E25
\r
20 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:36:00 -0800 (PST)
\r
21 Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
22 by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD5366E0024;
\r
23 Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:35:59 -0800 (PST)
\r
24 X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new
\r
25 Received: from finestructure.net (gwave-212.ligo.caltech.edu
\r
26 [131.215.114.212]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins) by earth-doxen-submit
\r
27 (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD7D66E00D3; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:35:55 -0800 (PST)
\r
28 Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
\r
29 id C904A38C; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:35:55 -0500 (EST)
\r
30 From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
31 To: Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>,
\r
32 David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
33 Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: optionally print subtest number
\r
34 In-Reply-To: <87hb14ukbc.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
35 References: <1323806207-31888-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net>
\r
36 <87zkew2jtu.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
37 <87d3bsjc1z.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87hb14ukbc.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
38 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+93~ga124635 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
39 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
40 Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:35:53 -0800
\r
41 Message-ID: <87pqfs2gfa.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
43 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
\r
44 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
45 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
46 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
48 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
49 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
50 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
51 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
52 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
53 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
54 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
55 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
56 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
57 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 23:36:00 -0000
\r
60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
62 On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 03:24:23 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmai=
\r
64 > BTW I have some plans to introduce optional explicit test ids that can
\r
65 > be used for inter-test dependencies. E.g.:
\r
67 > test_begin_subtest test-id-1 "A subtest"
\r
69 > ;; in another test requre that test-id-1 passed
\r
70 > test_require_subtest test-id-1
\r
72 Would the required test need to be listed twice, both on the
\r
73 begin_subtest line *and* in the require_subtest line?
\r
75 And again, why would the test id have to be any different that the
\r
76 existing test names? The tests already have names, so I don't
\r
77 understand why we would want to introduce some other kind of
\r
78 identification. Seems like it's just going to add extra confusion.
\r
80 And speaking of which, I sometimes worry that the test infrastructure
\r
81 itself is getting too complicated. Pretty soon we're going to need
\r
82 tests for the tests. I don't necessarily see the need to all of these
\r
83 extra features in the test suite, so I worry that it's just making
\r
84 everything harder to debug.
\r
89 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
\r
91 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
92 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
\r
94 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJO5+FZAAoJEO00zqvie6q8lhoP/jhjExA5NfqGXGNEuud6+EiH
\r
95 X4UAMav/6kwZYJHV8meAm9QQOsUDUW9gVQY0zrcslu2A+NqWt57eKafCHkQW1yDU
\r
96 1C63XDlR9pelN2HdFhyzPlfXBTn++MfANZQ+QqXb+y+v1htem3GKszbXIXxPOjn2
\r
97 A1kjYYSvJAhxYpQ/UrRSGUc4MaCbLRylggRDoqonrGtZCi7hKQh6QErPt1J/iPp3
\r
98 7dEV71sjQsTfl27OUEGnWIdFKUDRRodqyiV6lbeI2xLNcsKAmXyiI4v31PGs2aH2
\r
99 3XwpegitBN34Q+GBg/EfAIRyowrdluBCBx9cyB1VMDQF/VLnmjWWngVUwN5x8H55
\r
100 RjUfu/ze6g8FOiSEzzODF9g8YwQefy00lGs+JUaNgVcCFI1mivdrQcPsE1jV2Pb9
\r
101 cKcfa+9Mc07+aYgAM1FyiIbnWVgl12kLknW5UYviVpQTb4CsninYeMog2YbZg7Ar
\r
102 EZnoGpN7fzWAsvNd/Usy6dZGPZ2FBgFOajUC54J1Z1VDjFNpjfgG2teFhiNU3aiG
\r
103 tW0TUOxQh1fzDrqsjHiaMAuBfNGYOcJr0+UsXG7mKbe/O6WuTyNEyKi55ph11Xj+
\r
104 0ml6DBBbaqSrqVG5JTfxG1y+9DTd/58LSCscO46sE1vL3B6fRaBH3/x3mV117bo+
\r
105 3VKbP0Wd4AzVf7lvcFju
\r
107 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r