98/336b704da3efec5a112a8cadfc7d26452907e3

   1 Return-Path: <servilio@gmail.com>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D323E431FC1\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  9 Jun 2010 12:04:45 -0700 (PDT)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -0.599\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
  12         tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,\r
  13         DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001]\r
  14         autolearn=unavailable\r
  15 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  16         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  17         with ESMTP id arm+Fbk7pQP3 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  18         Wed,  9 Jun 2010 12:04:35 -0700 (PDT)\r
  19 Received: from mail-pz0-f177.google.com (mail-pz0-f177.google.com\r
  20         [209.85.222.177])\r
  21         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF864196F2\r
  22         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  9 Jun 2010 12:04:35 -0700 (PDT)\r
  23 Received: by pzk7 with SMTP id 7so3481614pzk.30\r
  24         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 12:04:33 -0700 (PDT)\r
  25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
  26         h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to\r
  27         :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;\r
  28         bh=TMUtrfn2ZR7EO8HwVHSrWtKJL1I1Mh8nddeuEGr+ofw=;\r
  29         b=lM0N6viucfWTjqo/Gfv0JPLQWKth73N8CpEwnIdBaEaTisNbWl++F208/YvRST/skd\r
  30         ArZWKOQY3ZpTLQ9SQgeWh2I9EFgBHv1Cto04sSeDo34p/lkn3lx+UVUFOPh7JfPdyD8f\r
  31         32jjG3k36ETURJqH9kuD72FTkxTS/RwG5h94c=\r
  32 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
  33         h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to\r
  34         :cc:content-type;\r
  35         b=FYc6XpPVKvdgQePdx/8bz+nC+rBVJ8cb8Wkux4WoHfG3F01KWCydhq0bM9DsendHcF\r
  36         6UqnG1wIvZUYdcn4LKkLkmu2mScmS1x6QAHpXTB+gzjpwthsIu5s9ZTK+KWk6CNJUjYe\r
  37         11ddvbacEjsnZjno99cJC5+8evrilIu0yayJc=\r
  38 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  39 Received: by 10.224.88.224 with SMTP id b32mr2289115qam.343.1276110272823; \r
  40         Wed, 09 Jun 2010 12:04:32 -0700 (PDT)\r
  41 Received: by 10.220.171.203 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 12:04:32 -0700 (PDT)\r
  42 In-Reply-To: <871vcghz8o.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
  43 References: <87zkz4xnf4.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
  44         <871vcghz8o.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
  45 Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 15:04:32 -0400\r
  46 Message-ID: <AANLkTinBy4zA0_BddkAEwugOybe-yoTVC-8VN_ftq037@mail.gmail.com>\r
  47 Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove message archiving from show-advance-and-archive\r
  48 From: "servilio@gmail.com" <servilio@gmail.com>\r
  49 To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>\r
  50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1\r
  51 Cc: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  52 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  53 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  54 Precedence: list\r
  55 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  56         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  57 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  58         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  59 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  60 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  61 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  62 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  63         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  64 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 19:04:46 -0000\r
  65 \r
  66 On 9 June 2010 13:50, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:\r
  67 [...]\r
  68 > Which makes me think that other operations should work similarly. '+'\r
  69 > and '-' should change tags on the current message (as they do currently)\r
  70 > and then new "M-+" and "M--" could change tags on all (open) messages in\r
  71 > the thread.\r
  72 >\r
  73 > That would highlight the current 'a' as out of place since it's\r
  74 > currently archiving every message in the thread. So I'd then fix it to\r
  75 > be 'a' for the current message and "M-a" for every (open) message in the\r
  76 > thread.\r
  77 >\r
  78 > What do people think of that?\r
  79 \r
  80 +2 I think this would be awesome. I am using "-" a lot to remove the\r
  81 "inbox" tag to individual messages.\r
  82 \r
  83 Servilio\r