97/ef067799344c79fb0aae49152f1ff60172ee04

   1 Return-Path: <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487CC431FB6\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun,  6 Feb 2011 14:39:33 -0800 (PST)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
  12         tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
  13         FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
  14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  15         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  16         with ESMTP id ZZAsIkJvYWbR for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  17         Sun,  6 Feb 2011 14:39:32 -0800 (PST)\r
  18 Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com (mail-bw0-f53.google.com\r
  19         [209.85.214.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))\r
  20         (No client certificate requested)\r
  21         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71875431FB5\r
  22         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun,  6 Feb 2011 14:39:32 -0800 (PST)\r
  23 Received: by bwg12 with SMTP id 12so5149518bwg.26\r
  24         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 14:39:28 -0800 (PST)\r
  25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
  26         h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date\r
  27         :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;\r
  28         bh=35bXHN6dE1PgA5I62MWcZLJdMma1OkJ1dlveIct9Yjw=;\r
  29         b=qseNnONrRmCtJlofMgruzKfsYjf1Y0heZfxY8oI3u3nkDd+MpE4F/nlbrsooxWVgXf\r
  30         bTXtfovSpRKcvyMcWqkotFMnz5yta8bLL8HvGr/Fv580J8tP4aqtzW1mZwVTaezKHzLj\r
  31         wI3hU1l1nPLUHhCp67CTDM3p1IL4xMT11BnuA=\r
  32 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
  33         h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to\r
  34         :cc:content-type;\r
  35         b=B06sNnCUhF6ztr+E/RMh+fhqjZgssg8FZu4oPU0B6P3rdRxnP2JGmoDfGhsQEC41GK\r
  36         14GKZdq2GzA5sc7TgI5BTWYqaGxsOPqOviI5S16F9MHBzwnjPanGTIF75PVz8nppLBxD\r
  37         EPRSNiqqVLL0bdPwqismHGTwQLU02NL/qgYoA=\r
  38 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  39 Received: by 10.204.128.200 with SMTP id l8mr3898233bks.60.1297031968580; Sun,\r
  40         06 Feb 2011 14:39:28 -0800 (PST)\r
  41 Received: by 10.204.102.9 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Feb 2011 14:39:28 -0800 (PST)\r
  42 In-Reply-To: <1296998473-13514-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
  43 References: <1296998473-13514-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
  44 Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 00:39:28 +0200\r
  45 Message-ID: <AANLkTi=uAiCn84w0oMujcv8ujvasJVYgc2GxUaMWHwa8@mail.gmail.com>\r
  46 Subject: Re: [PATCH] test/search: add check for slightly trick search\r
  47 From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>\r
  48 To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  49 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\r
  50 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  51 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  52 Precedence: list\r
  53 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  54         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  55 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  56         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  57 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  58 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  59 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  60 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  61         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  62 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 22:39:33 -0000\r
  63 \r
  64 On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Felipe Contreras\r
  65 <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:\r
  66 > It's not really tricky, there are many addresses with a '-' in them. I\r
  67 > personally really want to differentiate between foo, foo-testing, and\r
  68 > foo-patches.\r
  69 >\r
  70 > This fails, but it shouldn't:\r
  71 \r
  72 As discussed in IRC, perhaps the query should be 'search-by-from@',\r
  73 but that would require notmuch to distinguish @ as something special.\r
  74 Perhaps s/@/-at-/.\r
  75 \r
  76 Cheers.\r
  77 \r
  78 -- \r
  79 Felipe Contreras\r