94/29effc6510dfc1f4ee075456992c140d26efc5

   1 Return-Path: <five9a2@gmail.com>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B169431FAE\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:20:52 -0800 (PST)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
   9         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  10         with ESMTP id YNRRDCdv2vgs for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  11         Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:20:51 -0800 (PST)\r
  12 Received: from mail-bw0-f224.google.com (mail-bw0-f224.google.com\r
  13         [209.85.218.224])\r
  14         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92578431FBC\r
  15         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:20:51 -0800 (PST)\r
  16 Received: by bwz24 with SMTP id 24so3165734bwz.30\r
  17         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:20:50 -0800 (PST)\r
  18 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
  19         h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:from:to:cc:subject\r
  20         :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;\r
  21         bh=sNal901Lxj4qtdZsRwQjXCPl8C6xVDNSylsJy5mMDNg=;\r
  22         b=lw7hYyzG9MQ7528W8RA6YynIrNW7+hxymy03nRv1ZBFe570oFl95l9i86DrxgmNOSf\r
  23         HP5AYRAwg6SOGjoaXP46Bzk/xWz/JByGgw00qCZLb0w9Ncx8JJq5nmnnq+1cg8sA5qxc\r
  24         ENhTYrpbnuBl1rsgHmq/jsae076THbJFQIqKg=\r
  25 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
  26         h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id\r
  27         :mime-version:content-type;\r
  28         b=rjfj/VQhPFNv8/p9Pmwzg/7G1cErrVx4NLgcerItpmWFlNnFP96NzhS75OBSqwRRxq\r
  29         MEqaUbGMLYkF6P6Tgaf32igUVzESRdcyJBUc8/h3F31GwCV6V0I/rnjOoskTdhVZKbET\r
  30         Kmg8wIZDbtJOxKpFBTtmGylq7Yrt9Rwg2EQo8=\r
  31 Received: by 10.204.32.76 with SMTP id b12mr2830467bkd.165.1258845650764;\r
  32         Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:20:50 -0800 (PST)\r
  33 Received: from kunyang (vawpc43.ethz.ch [129.132.59.11])\r
  34         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 18sm3492222fks.34.2009.11.21.15.20.49\r
  35         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);\r
  36         Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:20:49 -0800 (PST)\r
  37 Sender: Jed Brown <five9a2@gmail.com>\r
  38 From: Jed Brown <jed@59A2.org>\r
  39 To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, Jan Janak <jan@ryngle.com>\r
  40 In-Reply-To: <87my2f329e.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
  41 References: <1258630481-5133-1-git-send-email-jan@ryngle.com>\r
  42         <1258630481-5133-2-git-send-email-jan@ryngle.com>\r
  43         <f35dbb950911190352q2dcd041fr83a2f722f3231f44@mail.gmail.com>\r
  44         <87lji2bmrb.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
  45         <f35dbb950911211307t1cd8e039xca754828c75b26f6@mail.gmail.com>\r
  46         <87my2f329e.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
  47 Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:21:19 +0100\r
  48 Message-ID: <876393tqfk.fsf@59A2.org>\r
  49 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
  51 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  52 Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH 2/2] notmuch list: A new command to produce\r
  53  various lists.\r
  54 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  55 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12\r
  56 Precedence: list\r
  57 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  58         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  59 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  60         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  61 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  62 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  63 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  64 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  65         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  66 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:20:52 -0000\r
  67 \r
  68 On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:07:57 +0100, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:\r
  69 > One thing we'll still have to think about is how to remove the "virtual\r
  70 > tags" from the completion list, (once we have virtual tags in the\r
  71 > configuration file---that is, tags applied automatically based on search\r
  72 > specifications).\r
  73 \r
  74 Do these need to be real tags?  Would it be sufficient for them to just\r
  75 be aliases for search patterns?  I think I would prefer the latter\r
  76 because I could modify the pattern and not have to rewrite tags to the\r
  77 whole database.  Maybe real tags are needed to optimize expensive\r
  78 patterns, but I wouldn't think the user needs to know about that.\r
  79 \r
  80 Jed\r