92/d366e599ee9aff36ed3efe0b6afb17ff0aa25d

   1 Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50546421186\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:54:48 -0700 (PDT)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
  12         tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
  13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  15         with ESMTP id M3LJA70EfNt5 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  16         Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:54:48 -0700 (PDT)\r
  17 Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
  18         [131.215.239.19])\r
  19         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0204429E5F\r
  20         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:54:47 -0700 (PDT)\r
  21 Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
  22         by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F4FB2E50EBD;\r
  23         Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:46:01 -0700 (PDT)\r
  24 X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new\r
  25 Received: from servo.finestructure.net (m17.ligo.caltech.edu\r
  26  [131.215.115.117])     (Authenticated sender: jrollins)        by fire-doxen-submit\r
  27  (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA1CF2E50E78;  Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:45:56 -0700 (PDT)\r
  28 Received: by servo.finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
  29         id 91CE955D; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:54:42 -0700 (PDT)\r
  30 From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
  31 To: Mark Anderson <ma.skies@gmail.com>, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>,\r
  32         Sander Boer <sanboer@gmail.com>\r
  33 Subject: Re: notmuch Digest, Vol 20, Issue 57\r
  34 In-Reply-To: <877h84ie2w.fsf@gmail.com>\r
  35 References: <mailman.5.1309146869.12973.notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  36         <cuozkl367o2.fsf@mauc.nl> <87wrg5905c.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
  37         <cuoliwlws13.fsf@mauc.nl> <87hb79intl.fsf@gmail.com>\r
  38         <87tyb97bt1.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <877h84ie2w.fsf@gmail.com>\r
  39 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-292-gaa2fa19 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
  40         (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
  41 Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:54:40 -0700\r
  42 Message-ID: <87aad0xsrz.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>\r
  43 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  44 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
  45         micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
  46 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  47 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  48 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  49 Precedence: list\r
  50 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  51         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  52 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  53         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  54 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  55 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  56 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  57 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  58         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  59 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 20:54:48 -0000\r
  60 \r
  61 --=-=-=\r
  62 \r
  63 On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:21:11 -0600, Mark Anderson <ma.skies@gmail.com> wrote:\r
  64 > I personally prefer --output=files remain as it was, with one file per\r
  65 > mail (even though I submitted the patch to change it).  I suggest that\r
  66 > we could add another format to supply all files (perhaps\r
  67 > --output=allfiles, or --output=dupfiles).  I don't like my original\r
  68 > suggestion of "filelists" because it implies a list of lists to me.  A\r
  69 > list of lists would correlate better to the number of messages which\r
  70 > match the search terms, but doesn't correlate well to xargs input.\r
  71 \r
  72 What's wrong with just outputting all the files matching the search,\r
  73 including duplicates?  I can't think of any reason where one would want\r
  74 to not include all files matching the search.  I would be curious to\r
  75 hear a use case there.\r
  76 \r
  77 Since I'm on this kick anyway, I'm going to keep pushing against further\r
  78 customizations where there really isn't a need.\r
  79 \r
  80 jamie.\r
  81 \r
  82 --=-=-=\r
  83 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
  84 \r
  85 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
  86 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
  87 \r
  88 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJOC5EQAAoJEO00zqvie6q8+ecP/R2p4l3bParJHTFk7gF9hEgM\r
  89 nPWIb7k4/hpN1LxKkZsTQOlqe61/WFcW0VscpbzxbK4M1hqqWX2gx/MT0WefPRJA\r
  90 Cf7ZQy9sJjPf4HuB7ViBtjvq00MX2w6DpDTNnvBlWkkIfl7iHEX+JRv0e1zSUQ6L\r
  91 a8hf7hvm62/nvLniTG1h8Y7zE11rjwHnV/oXRSCap5w2uocWUuzIBnPObQDr80q3\r
  92 lDt5GvWO6heP67orePVvep0kCFk+JOORAgc3vkYgaCJ8a3qX3lMxeYTYXFR7nt+P\r
  93 coHP2Hi2TayUDrOv5Hjwkka8929xOSJ8yDfA6en+9EDivFsL2isObIQm2y6XAtZL\r
  94 Lx88sye1q8xDL45G6i75SFoAwhz+2AKkx0m7yfMJviERdhnstRpAnci0uY9Hp1EV\r
  95 5FkiHAY31iO85ATKNiCN+ZTTBYm5NXYzfC7Q4rJ70uUQa2XFycFD0YcleTp1JjtM\r
  96 i52lc/y6W1JUp57SgWN/9Aix1Y3f9RB3qexzN0CmgdsHd0ukkWt9VMAHzrJiA/KH\r
  97 zyBfQKoU3LYDJEWSN4EvAAl/weiRr5G9ETT4NjFconHhlGPFhwRLeWl6jHCOWIH7\r
  98 wZdjNZDS/5HlrArz/WhvRbWYWyZU2oeZueJGyGmVlOW8ltICBDYs/D5jf0c8hc+m\r
  99 w3WbT8utByFZlrEbsJ/T\r
 100 =Gw26\r
 101 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
 102 --=-=-=--\r