90/9f668542b74d0f2b9fe7e51cfee3260aaa8c37

   1 Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@nixu.com>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3D02431FD0\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:53:14 -0800 (PST)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: 0\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
  12         autolearn=disabled\r
  13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  15         with ESMTP id 9xeD8q1H8CIG for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  16         Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:53:14 -0800 (PST)\r
  17 Received: from mail-gw3.nixu.fi (mail-gw3.nixu.fi [193.209.237.7])\r
  18         (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
  19         (No client certificate requested)\r
  20         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 009D1431FB6\r
  21         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:53:13 -0800 (PST)\r
  22 Received: from pps.filterd (mail-gw3 [127.0.0.1])\r
  23         by mail-gw3.nixu.fi (8.14.4/8.14.4) with SMTP id pBSLoPcG021384;\r
  24         Wed, 28 Dec 2011 23:53:06 +0200\r
  25 Received: from taco2.nixu.fi (taco2.nixu.fi [194.197.118.31])\r
  26         by mail-gw3.nixu.fi with ESMTP id 114cs0w2h5-1\r
  27         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);\r
  28         Wed, 28 Dec 2011 23:53:06 +0200\r
  29 Received: from taco2.nixu.fi (taco2.nixu.fi [194.197.118.31])\r
  30         by taco2.nixu.fi (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id\r
  31         pBSLr44x022513; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 23:53:04 +0200\r
  32 From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
  33 To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,\r
  34         Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  35 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Ignore encrypted parts when indexing.\r
  36 In-Reply-To: <1325103269-14599-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
  37 References: <1325005901-21374-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
  38         <1325103269-14599-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
  39 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+137~gbed6022 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
  40         (i686-pc-linux-gnu)\r
  41 X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL\r
  42         $[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F\r
  43         !)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z\r
  44 Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 23:53:04 +0200\r
  45 Message-ID: <yf6wr9gjrcv.fsf@taco2.nixu.fi>\r
  46 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  47 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
  48 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.5.7110,\r
  49  1.0.211,       0.0.0000        definitions=2011-12-28_07:2011-12-28, 2011-12-28,\r
  50         1970-01-01 signatures=0\r
  51 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0\r
  52         ipscore=0 suspectscore=0\r
  53         phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0\r
  54         reason=mlx\r
  55         scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1112280148\r
  56 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  57 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  58 Precedence: list\r
  59 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  60         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  61 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  62         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  63 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  64 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  65 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  66 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  67         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  68 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 21:53:14 -0000\r
  69 \r
  70 On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 12:14:29 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:\r
  71 > It appears to be an oversight that encrypted parts were indexed\r
  72 > previously.  The terms generated from encrypted parts are meaningless\r
  73 > and do nothing but add bloat to the database.  It is not worth\r
  74 > indexing the encrypted content, just as it's not worth indexing the\r
  75 > signatures in signed parts.\r
  76 > ---\r
  77 \r
  78 LGTM.\r
  79 \r
  80 Tomi\r