1 Return-Path: <error4me@gmx.de>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D61431E64
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:34:53 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001]
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id pUkjvp6Eu71I for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:34:52 -0800 (PST)
\r
18 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23])
\r
19 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F86D431FBC
\r
20 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:34:52 -0800 (PST)
\r
21 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2012 22:34:50 -0000
\r
22 Received: from p54BE2F5E.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO shi.workgroup) [84.190.47.94]
\r
23 by mail.gmx.net (mp029) with SMTP; 30 Jan 2012 23:34:50 +0100
\r
24 X-Authenticated: #19296480
\r
25 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19n+fUZ8Z1niSsF2IzcN6zH1DAPYhfk0+/l89pzWr
\r
27 Received: from grfz by shi.workgroup with local (Exim 4.77)
\r
28 (envelope-from <error4me@gmx.de>)
\r
29 id 1Rrzo4-0000l4-RS; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:34:36 +0100
\r
30 Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:34:16 +0100
\r
31 From: Gregor Zattler <telegraph@gmx.net>
\r
32 To: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
33 Subject: Re: Bug?: notmuch-search-show-thread shows several threads; only one
\r
34 containing matching messages
\r
35 Message-ID: <20120130223416.GA26239@shi.workgroup>
\r
36 Mail-Followup-To: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
37 References: <20120126004024.GA13704@shi.workgroup>
\r
38 <20120126011903.GA1176@mit.edu>
\r
39 <8762fzry7k.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
40 <20120126124450.GB30209@shi.workgroup> <87mx9avbc1.fsf@praet.org>
\r
41 <20120129234213.GB11460@shi.workgroup> <87zkd5655g.fsf@praet.org>
\r
42 <20120130190425.GB13521@shi.workgroup> <878vkoev95.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
44 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
45 Content-Disposition: inline
\r
46 In-Reply-To: <878vkoev95.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
47 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
\r
49 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
50 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
52 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
53 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
54 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
55 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
56 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
57 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
58 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
59 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
60 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
61 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:34:53 -0000
\r
64 * Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> [30. Jan. 2012]:
\r
65 > On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:04:25 +0100, Gregor Zattler <telegraph@gmx.net> wrote:
\r
66 >> * Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org> [30. Jan. 2012]:
\r
67 >>> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:42:14 +0100, Gregor Zattler <telegraph@gmx.net> wrote:
\r
68 >>>> * Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org> [26. Jan. 2012]:
\r
69 >>>>> Here's another couple of threads squashed into a single one:
\r
70 >>>>> - [O] [Use Question] Capture and long lines
\r
71 >>>>> - id:"BANLkTikoF4tXuNLLufRzNSD6k2ZYs7sUcg@mail.gmail.com"
\r
72 >>>>> - [O] Worg update
\r
73 >>>>> - id:"m1wrfiz3ch.fsf@tsdye.com"
\r
74 >>>>> - [O] Table formula to convert hex to dec
\r
75 >>>>> - id:"20110724080054.GB16388@x201"
\r
76 >>>>> - [O] ICS import?
\r
77 >>>>> - id:"20120125173421.GQ3747@x201"
\r
80 >>>>> AFAICT, none of them share Message-Id's...
\r
82 >>>> Do you consider this a bug?
\r
85 >>> I do. No idea what causes it or how to fix it though... :)
\r
87 >> First I thougt it' not a severe bug since one see's more not less
\r
88 >> messages in notmuch show buffer. But later I realised one also
\r
89 >> sees less not more threads in notmuch search buffer and might not
\r
90 >> read certain notmuch threads because of "wrong" $Subject: in
\r
91 >> notmuch search buffer.
\r
93 > I think notmuch links two messages into the same thread if they have an
\r
94 > in-reply-to or reference header in common: i.e the messages reference a
\r
95 > common parent message. (See comment in lib/database.cc "Even before a
\r
96 > message is added, it's pre-allocated thread ID is useful so that all
\r
97 > descendant messages that reference this common parent can be recognized
\r
98 > as belonging to the same thread.")
\r
100 So in case message a from thread A and message b from B would
\r
101 name the same Message c in their In-Reoply-To:/References:
\r
102 headers, while c is not (for some reason) in A or B, notmuch
\r
103 would assume both threads linked? Makes sense.
\r
105 > As far as I can see your grep tests haven't checked for that.
\r
109 > Also, could you email me the mbox you had (I think you said that it was
\r
110 > a mailing list so all public) and I will take a look?
\r
112 Sure, I do so off-list because of the size of the attachment.
\r
117 -... --- .-. . -.. ..--.. ...-.-
\r