1 Return-Path: <tom.prince@ualberta.net>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F346431FBC
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 09:38:51 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id 42aqK2OBOFPI for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Sat, 10 Mar 2012 09:38:51 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from socrates.hocat.ca (socrates.hocat.ca [76.10.188.53])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07D3E431FAE
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 09:38:51 -0800 (PST)
\r
20 Received: from hermes.hocat.ca (hermes.hocat.ca [69.165.170.253])
\r
21 by socrates.hocat.ca (Postfix) with SMTP id 5060D1AE3;
\r
22 Sat, 10 Mar 2012 10:38:47 -0700 (MST)
\r
23 Received: (nullmailer pid 14148 invoked by uid 1000);
\r
24 Sat, 10 Mar 2012 17:38:45 -0000
\r
25 From: Tom Prince <tom.prince@ualberta.net>
\r
26 To: Jeremy Nickurak <not-much@trk.nickurak.ca>,
\r
27 notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
28 Subject: Re: a DoS vulnerability associated with conflated Message-IDs?
\r
30 <CA+eQo_3x+VJMoB1U1R-vvk==u4x6drKikHrr=HHZZnsZEE7PmQ@mail.gmail.com>
\r
31 References: <87k42vrqve.fsf@pip.fifthhorseman.net>
\r
32 <87ipif2fdn.fsf@wyzanski.jamesvasile.com>
\r
33 <4F58E962.1050403@fifthhorseman.net>
\r
34 <CA+eQo_3x+VJMoB1U1R-vvk==u4x6drKikHrr=HHZZnsZEE7PmQ@mail.gmail.com>
\r
35 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+239~g4d2d96b (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.2
\r
36 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
37 Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:38:44 -0500
\r
38 Message-ID: <87y5r84aqj.fsf@hermes.hocat.ca>
\r
40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
41 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
42 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
44 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
45 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
46 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
47 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
48 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
49 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
50 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
51 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
52 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
53 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 17:38:51 -0000
\r
55 On Thu, 8 Mar 2012 10:38:32 -0700, Jeremy Nickurak <not-much@trk.nickurak.ca> wrote:
\r
56 > On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:16, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
\r
57 > > Any other suggestions or ideas?
\r
59 > What about representing the contents from both message in one apparent message?
\r
61 > - If the bodies disagree, display both.
\r
63 We'd probably need to do some like doing a diff. I find it annoying
\r
64 enough displaying both text and html copies of a mail. Displaying two
\r
65 copies of a message, just because one of them has a few extra lines as a
\r
66 footer would be equally annoying.
\r
68 Maybe it would be enough to ignore the signature too, when comparing messages?
\r