1 Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB09431FB6
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:24:42 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id iphaZX7zWhdm for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:24:41 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from brinza.cc.columbia.edu (brinza.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.8])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B519F431FB5
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:24:41 -0800 (PST)
\r
20 Received: from servo.finestructure.net
\r
21 (adsl-71-131-187-9.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net [71.131.187.9])
\r
22 (user=jgr2110 author=jrollins@finestructure.net mech=PLAIN bits=0)
\r
23 by brinza.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p14HOb0Z013085
\r
24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
\r
25 Fri, 4 Feb 2011 12:24:39 -0500 (EST)
\r
26 Received: from jrollins by servo.finestructure.net with local (Exim 4.72)
\r
27 (envelope-from <jrollins@finestructure.net>)
\r
28 id 1PlPOd-0006Rs-Md; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:24:35 -0800
\r
29 From: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
30 To: David Bremner <bremner@unb.ca>, notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
31 Subject: Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support
\r
32 In-Reply-To: <87zkqcugvt.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
33 References: <4CF15D67.1070904@fifthhorseman.net>
\r
34 <87aak08fu8.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
35 <87fwsf9mip.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
36 <87tygl29vu.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
37 <87zkqcugvt.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
38 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-95-g454bad3 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1
\r
40 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:24:23 -0800
\r
41 Message-ID: <87tygjiugo.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
43 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
\r
44 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
45 X-No-Spam-Score: Local
\r
46 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.8
\r
47 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
48 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
50 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
51 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
52 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
53 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
54 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
55 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
56 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
57 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
58 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
59 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 17:24:42 -0000
\r
62 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
64 On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 08:24:38 -0400, David Bremner <bremner@unb.ca> wrote:
\r
65 > On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:18:45 -0800, Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructu=
\r
67 > > Hi, all. I have pushed a new branch called "crypto" to my notmuch
\r
68 > > repository [0]. This branch provides full support for PGP/MIME signed
\r
69 > > and encrypted messages, including emacs UI support. It has been applied
\r
70 > > on top of cworth's current master (21e97c50). It includes the
\r
74 > For a signed and encrypted message, if the signing key can't be found,
\r
77 > [ multipart/encrypted: decryption error ]
\r
79 > which is a bit mystifying. At least gpg on the command line will
\r
80 > decrypt the message and print a warning about the signature.
\r
82 So I need to look at this closer, but I think this is a GMime problem.
\r
83 That error message is generated when the GMime decryption code returns
\r
84 NULL for the decrypted part. I'll try to make a test case for this, and
\r
85 file a bug with GMime upstream.
\r
90 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
\r
92 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
93 Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
\r
95 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNTDZJAAoJEO00zqvie6q8k7cQAKUq9EDSc6GSLd31J1TL3Ohb
\r
96 sGfxFocCrdtryhzgcarsPNtljlFS+DQ/Qrc6VwLETCCHgQ61ck3kz65DqdRthFCw
\r
97 P5e3Mz0d+faB8eA8g8ITqnehiy602oVUhgsXuJlncATubHg9K9Gvq0Og5K8dB8FL
\r
98 EzB8Rdx8U+G7iQBWfL1mSj82/9DyFmY3mxrYFZfejHeMnEfWpzplElEMETL1q/RD
\r
99 fBO1PY/z2XukdfsJ+8R2EQn5V7rggb0hE+wG31bAmGEeBWl7W6vXN6RfOAGuGzKN
\r
100 sDPfEcoWyvKlSwpELqFUs3sX5/xUvp9bF5O6O7tsWfdloBLJFt6W4Y1VZcN+JR+y
\r
101 2VLqrO8eYM71UkZMuvkt73fXxr/msEeLyidNW7xQZqWMyGZnt1A3H9VBOiE8ULie
\r
102 wU/pbr95AlQPQciJNUKmsPN/jxgYLvwCurVwsaVzXMTZtS6PoGGBbusrgk1sXdAS
\r
103 ViFp1YJ8KfKUiJ/Cu/90UlM9O1/mW68Ne/DuY/qm15CSsoDasHHNCeeENmRC4gM0
\r
104 zLwYA1jjcGCwJhv0bvOzJuBM90rKKcd3mrL6ymvzKduNADkvrciPzggyp3zrDGt9
\r
105 +mLfzA8oK3BP56ZBk17/xxUF3XseY6wA288yBdYBwiXHAz5ye411388IxDjt1ymp
\r
106 wZq3qdwyS0n88OJpMjG3
\r
108 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r