Re: [PATCH 0/4] Allow specifying alternate names for addresses in other_email
[notmuch-archives.git] / 8b / 936d43005b1ed5e312dca074c3cc1546b69bc8
1 Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB09431FB6\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  4 Feb 2011 09:24:42 -0800 (PST)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
10 X-Spam-Level: \r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
12         tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
15         with ESMTP id iphaZX7zWhdm for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
16         Fri,  4 Feb 2011 09:24:41 -0800 (PST)\r
17 Received: from brinza.cc.columbia.edu (brinza.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.8])\r
18         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B519F431FB5\r
19         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  4 Feb 2011 09:24:41 -0800 (PST)\r
20 Received: from servo.finestructure.net\r
21         (adsl-71-131-187-9.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net [71.131.187.9])\r
22         (user=jgr2110 author=jrollins@finestructure.net mech=PLAIN bits=0)\r
23         by brinza.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p14HOb0Z013085\r
24         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);\r
25         Fri, 4 Feb 2011 12:24:39 -0500 (EST)\r
26 Received: from jrollins by servo.finestructure.net with local (Exim 4.72)\r
27         (envelope-from <jrollins@finestructure.net>)\r
28         id 1PlPOd-0006Rs-Md; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:24:35 -0800\r
29 From: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
30 To: David Bremner <bremner@unb.ca>, notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
31 Subject: Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support\r
32 In-Reply-To: <87zkqcugvt.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
33 References: <4CF15D67.1070904@fifthhorseman.net>\r
34         <87aak08fu8.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
35         <87fwsf9mip.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
36         <87tygl29vu.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
37         <87zkqcugvt.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
38 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-95-g454bad3 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1\r
39         (i486-pc-linux-gnu)\r
40 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:24:23 -0800\r
41 Message-ID: <87tygjiugo.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
42 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
43 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
44         micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
45 X-No-Spam-Score: Local\r
46 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.8\r
47 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
48 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
49 Precedence: list\r
50 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
51         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
52 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
53         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
54 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
55 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
56 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
57 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
58         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
59 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 17:24:42 -0000\r
60 \r
61 --=-=-=\r
62 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
63 \r
64 On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 08:24:38 -0400, David Bremner <bremner@unb.ca> wrote:\r
65 > On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:18:45 -0800, Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructu=\r
66 re.net> wrote:\r
67 > > Hi, all.  I have pushed a new branch called "crypto" to my notmuch\r
68 > > repository [0].  This branch provides full support for PGP/MIME signed\r
69 > > and encrypted messages, including emacs UI support.  It has been applied\r
70 > > on top of cworth's current master (21e97c50).  It includes the\r
71 > > following:\r
72 > >=20\r
73 >=20\r
74 > For a signed and encrypted message, if the signing key can't be found,\r
75 > one just gets:\r
76 >=20\r
77 >  [ multipart/encrypted: decryption error ]\r
78 >=20\r
79 > which is a bit mystifying.  At least gpg on the command line will\r
80 > decrypt the message and print a warning about the signature.\r
81 \r
82 So I need to look at this closer, but I think this is a GMime problem.\r
83 That error message is generated when the GMime decryption code returns\r
84 NULL for the decrypted part.  I'll try to make a test case for this, and\r
85 file a bug with GMime upstream.\r
86 \r
87 jamie.\r
88 \r
89 --=-=-=\r
90 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
91 \r
92 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
93 Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
94 \r
95 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNTDZJAAoJEO00zqvie6q8k7cQAKUq9EDSc6GSLd31J1TL3Ohb\r
96 sGfxFocCrdtryhzgcarsPNtljlFS+DQ/Qrc6VwLETCCHgQ61ck3kz65DqdRthFCw\r
97 P5e3Mz0d+faB8eA8g8ITqnehiy602oVUhgsXuJlncATubHg9K9Gvq0Og5K8dB8FL\r
98 EzB8Rdx8U+G7iQBWfL1mSj82/9DyFmY3mxrYFZfejHeMnEfWpzplElEMETL1q/RD\r
99 fBO1PY/z2XukdfsJ+8R2EQn5V7rggb0hE+wG31bAmGEeBWl7W6vXN6RfOAGuGzKN\r
100 sDPfEcoWyvKlSwpELqFUs3sX5/xUvp9bF5O6O7tsWfdloBLJFt6W4Y1VZcN+JR+y\r
101 2VLqrO8eYM71UkZMuvkt73fXxr/msEeLyidNW7xQZqWMyGZnt1A3H9VBOiE8ULie\r
102 wU/pbr95AlQPQciJNUKmsPN/jxgYLvwCurVwsaVzXMTZtS6PoGGBbusrgk1sXdAS\r
103 ViFp1YJ8KfKUiJ/Cu/90UlM9O1/mW68Ne/DuY/qm15CSsoDasHHNCeeENmRC4gM0\r
104 zLwYA1jjcGCwJhv0bvOzJuBM90rKKcd3mrL6ymvzKduNADkvrciPzggyp3zrDGt9\r
105 +mLfzA8oK3BP56ZBk17/xxUF3XseY6wA288yBdYBwiXHAz5ye411388IxDjt1ymp\r
106 wZq3qdwyS0n88OJpMjG3\r
107 =PBkR\r
108 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
109 --=-=-=--\r