1 Return-Path: <BATV+28bf489b39c899822e75+2435+infradead.org+hohndel@bombadil.srs.infradead.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB344196F3
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id QvsXKIzJSk8N for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:53:18 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06444196F2
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:53:18 -0700 (PDT)
\r
20 Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=x200.gr8dns.org)
\r
21 by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux))
\r
22 id 1O5ibW-0005ju-5S; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 16:53:18 +0000
\r
23 Received: by x200.gr8dns.org (Postfix, from userid 500)
\r
24 id A34EECC593; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:53:17 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 From: Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@infradead.org>
\r
26 To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
27 Subject: Re: Wrapping up the 0.3 release
\r
28 In-Reply-To: <87ljcchnfc.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
29 References: <87ljcchnfc.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
30 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2-187-g7c5f017 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1
\r
31 (i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
\r
32 Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:53:17 -0700
\r
33 Message-ID: <m3eii43i82.fsf@x200.gr8dns.org>
\r
35 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
36 X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from <hohndel@infradead.org> by
\r
37 bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html
\r
38 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
39 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
41 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
42 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
43 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
44 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
45 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
46 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
47 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
48 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
49 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
50 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 16:53:19 -0000
\r
53 On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 08:37:11 -0700, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:
\r
54 > I pushed hard to get most everything we wanted for 0.3 done yesterday,
\r
55 > (which was one week since 0.2). I think we're still within the tolerance
\r
56 > of my published "about a week" schedule, but I would like to wrap things
\r
59 > Here are the features that I still have left in my queue at this point:
\r
61 > * improve from-header guessing
\r
63 > Dirk is looking into fixing a segfault found by the test suite here
\r
65 I sent a patch last night - but it's not realtive to the last thing that
\r
66 I sent, instead relative to last night's master. Do you want me to
\r
69 Basically, the way I was trying to do concatenation of Received headers
\r
70 earlier was fundamentally broken - it made assumptions about being able
\r
71 to continue reading the headers even after we closed the file already.
\r
75 > * Fcc, Maildir, and Emacs message-mode -- a bit of code
\r
77 > This is next on my list to apply. Thanks for the extra testing!
\r
79 > There are a few other features that people had proposed but that didn't
\r
80 > pass review yet. If people follow-up with those quickly, they can still
\r
81 > go in. Otherwise, there's another new merge window coming up soon!
\r
83 I'll be working on notmuch for the next few hours and once my git trees
\r
84 are straightened out again, I'll look into what's missing from my wish
\r
87 > Meanwhile, I'm aware of two regressions I'd like to see fixed before
\r
90 > * Reply is now splitting the window
\r
92 > We're copying the original message into the new reply buffer, so
\r
93 > what's the advantage of splitting here?
\r
95 I'll voice my "don't like" of this feature as well, I guess.
\r
97 > * Composing a new message with 'm' brings up headers in a scrambled
\r
100 > A minor point, but it would be nice to fix this.
\r
102 It doesn't for me with origin/master. Or let me double check... what do
\r
103 you think would be the correct order (as this is a matter of taste for
\r
106 > Finally, any of the tweaks I suggested to notmuch-hello mode would be
\r
107 > quite welcome. I might take a whack at some of these.
\r
109 > Then, there's the task of writing up NEWS. Dirk started helping with
\r
110 > that, which I appreciate. If anyone else wants to write up descriptions
\r
111 > of their favorite features that have been merged, that would be great.
\r
113 I think we should make this a "requirement" for patches to include a
\r
114 little NEWS blurb and either a test case or an explanation why there
\r
115 isn't a test case...
\r
projects / notmuch-archives.git / blob