1 Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A4E431FAF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:54:44 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
\r
13 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id c0+nIsSRsoLm for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:54:44 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])
\r
19 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE7F6431FAE
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:54:43 -0700 (PDT)
\r
23 Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])
\r
24 by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
\r
25 (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)
\r
26 id 1SMx3e-00064b-Mc; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 08:54:38 +0100
\r
27 Received: from 94-192-233-223.zone6.bethere.co.uk ([94.192.233.223]
\r
29 by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69)
\r
30 (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)
\r
31 id 1SMx3e-0003tW-Be; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 08:54:38 +0100
\r
32 From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>
\r
33 To: Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>
\r
34 Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: add a filter option to show
\r
35 In-Reply-To: <20120425025506.GM17810@mit.edu>
\r
36 References: <1335309421-18893-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com>
\r
37 <20120425025506.GM17810@mit.edu>
\r
38 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+128~g0f26d91 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
39 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
40 Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 08:54:57 +0100
\r
41 Message-ID: <87ty081c1a.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
43 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
44 X-Sender-Host-Address: 94.192.233.223
\r
45 X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :)
\r
46 X-QM-Body-MD5: d431bbb5df550fdd8b03c89b8ed34ef1 (of first 20000 bytes)
\r
47 X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8
\r
48 X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: -
\r
49 X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to
\r
51 spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.
\r
52 This message scored -1.8 points.
\r
53 Summary of the scoring:
\r
54 * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
\r
56 * [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org]
\r
57 * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
\r
58 provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)
\r
59 * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
\r
61 * 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
\r
62 X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean
\r
63 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
64 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
65 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
67 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
68 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
69 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
70 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
71 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
72 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
73 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
74 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
75 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
76 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 07:54:44 -0000
\r
78 On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU> wrote:
\r
79 > LGTM. I've been wanting this functionality for a while, but have been
\r
80 > too lazy to implement it myself.
\r
82 > I do have one request, though. Could we bind this to 'l' for "limit"?
\r
83 > Generally we've been quite good at making the shift key a modifier to
\r
84 > the functionality of the lower-case binding, which argues against 'F'.
\r
85 > It would also make sense to switch away from 'f' for filtering
\r
86 > (limiting) in search-view; 'f' is one of the few bindings that's used
\r
87 > in both search and show mode with completely different meanings and
\r
88 > 'l' would be a good candidate for the related functionality in both
\r
91 Yes I think that is a good idea. I will wait a little for other replies
\r
92 and then send a new version.
\r
94 I think 'f' in search view should do a "forward-thread" functionality
\r
95 which could also be linked from 'F' in show mode. I know we don't have
\r
96 this functionality yet but unless people think it is not worth
\r
97 supporting I think reserving the natural key is worth while.
\r