1 Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FDB4431FCB
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 08:20:12 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.126 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.873,
\r
12 BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] autolearn=ham
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id A1SQ57r442eN for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Tue, 2 Feb 2010 08:20:11 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from serrano.cc.columbia.edu (serrano.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.6])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DE10431FC4
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 08:20:11 -0800 (PST)
\r
20 Received: from servo.finestructure.net (geco.phys.columbia.edu
\r
22 (user=jgr2110 author=jrollins@finestructure.net mech=PLAIN bits=0)
\r
23 by serrano.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o12GK7xt029799
\r
24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
\r
25 Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:20:08 -0500 (EST)
\r
26 Received: from jrollins by servo.finestructure.net with local (Exim 4.71)
\r
27 (envelope-from <jrollins@finestructure.net>)
\r
28 id 1NcLTz-0003Gg-EM; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:20:07 -0500
\r
29 From: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
30 To: Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
31 In-Reply-To: <1265122868-12133-1-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
\r
32 References: <201001291049.21048.sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
\r
33 <1265122868-12133-1-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
\r
34 Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:20:02 -0500
\r
35 Message-ID: <87eil3ehjh.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
37 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
\r
38 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
39 X-No-Spam-Score: Local
\r
40 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.6
\r
41 Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCHv2] Preserve folder information when indexing
\r
42 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
43 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
45 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
46 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
47 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
48 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
49 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
50 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
51 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
52 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
53 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
54 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:20:12 -0000
\r
57 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
\r
58 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
60 On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:01:08 +0100, Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> wrot=
\r
62 > Stores the folder (directory name) of the message in the database as a
\r
63 > term with folder prefix.
\r
65 > This patch was originally sent by Andreas Kl=C3=B6ckner. The differences
\r
66 > from the original patch are:
\r
67 > - Folder name is taken from strings generated during travesal. It no
\r
68 > longer uses glib nor it allocates additional memory to determine the
\r
69 > base name. The same approach as in
\r
70 > id:87fx8bygi7.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com was used.
\r
71 > - Removed unrelated change which was submitted separately as
\r
72 > id:1264691584-8290-2-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz
\r
73 > - Changed the comment describing database schema.
\r
75 > TODO (see the previous Carl's email):
\r
76 > - Support hierarchical folders
\r
78 Hey, Michal. Thank you very much for this patch! This is right on with
\r
79 what I mentioned as high-priority improvements.
\r
81 I just gave it a try, though, and it seemed to be behaving a little
\r
82 strangely. I currently have two subdirectories, "inbox" and "sent".
\r
83 However, new mail to either directory was showing up under the search:
\r
85 notmuch search folder:inbox
\r
87 and nothing was showing up under the search:
\r
89 notmuch search folder:sent
\r
91 I wonder if there's a problem with the logic it uses to determine the
\r
92 folder naming? Do you think you could look into this? I would really
\r
93 like to push to have a patch like this applied upstream soon.
\r
98 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
\r
100 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
101 Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
\r
103 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLaFCzAAoJEO00zqvie6q8enwP/iIx6quoHdcWQ6RdWvFhBI/D
\r
104 ybBH+IXGBfjpgnsqFsck2fWYCzaCinmgkzxo5HqXhCCSOZHOF4isVfrniNzuR4kW
\r
105 uZx1ZQSn0x45hrA/sS+vSYapio8+U08maXZJ0z49luf496xHeZkPqCviF+PR5vKX
\r
106 mCFMj4NBdk9u1OyrhwV17qjTsUp3q+iGMjzedW58FPpOf16k/baqVAJQysFFzyrz
\r
107 Yo0Z63dJ0PrgL5+4ZkxMjaGKEejgIddGXLbS0CZbNKtny98bMpwdBDQjAupai6Ud
\r
108 /BCz7db6mu8+mRRYSzvUGHtvJW1bemAzmwOJJFybwhL36i2k8thDkXWGWwgaLfHB
\r
109 els85P+DviQ+kUH2wVObJr58R+t3AS1mG/iNc5XsDDnZJmMXjrLheg4yNdxvgKZ7
\r
110 AOOkIYxcWjMfpR5a1qt4z1b/t9TSmELrSy8b1a83rEDFE5JcasQYa/ppr35/qqwo
\r
111 O/Mp3KK+hS2vRgU+6Apt8/XjlIlFSoFR8f4QcVhdFelS09I7YGoXsXLZqAhS+Bvr
\r
112 x1YnKZpgIeWW0HFx5lPBkLVjpwcSlZLAuxhvNMPjs2WYwTIoZpfwbxcZGMsXyD4X
\r
113 ZJGKWJLVR6XLnwyLIJGtJmS4fwR2v6qTMVU5E1PagIztsgNa4ia3QNRapna5oon5
\r
114 jFfymOy+KCzTR3F6/vgq
\r
116 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r