1 Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493E8431FD0
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 02:49:28 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id SxIj7tKelUGL for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Thu, 22 Dec 2011 02:49:24 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from tempo.its.unb.ca (tempo.its.unb.ca [131.202.1.21])
\r
18 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4188B431FB6
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 02:49:24 -0800 (PST)
\r
22 Received: from zancas.localnet
\r
23 (fctnnbsc36w-156034079193.pppoe-dynamic.High-Speed.nb.bellaliant.net
\r
24 [156.34.79.193]) (authenticated bits=0)
\r
25 by tempo.its.unb.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pBMAnDRt030547
\r
26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
\r
27 Thu, 22 Dec 2011 06:49:13 -0400
\r
28 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.77)
\r
29 (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)
\r
30 id 1RdgD2-0007Z1-LU; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 06:49:12 -0400
\r
31 From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
\r
32 To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,
\r
33 Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
34 Subject: Re: have "notmuch help" call man?
\r
35 In-Reply-To: <87k45pqkaz.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
36 References: <87zkescxp5.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87iplbyj0w.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
37 <87ehvxtgoi.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
38 <87k45pqkaz.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
39 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+124~g2cefb38 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
40 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
41 Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 06:49:12 -0400
\r
42 Message-ID: <878vm4ubiv.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
44 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
45 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
46 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
48 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
49 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
50 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
51 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
52 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
53 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
54 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
55 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
56 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
57 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 10:49:28 -0000
\r
59 On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 20:53:08 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
\r
61 > * There are a couple of formatting issues (notmuch.1, notmuch-config.1,
\r
64 I'm sure there are. Can you be more specific? I suspect I might fix a
\r
65 different set of problems than you found ;).
\r
67 > * The notmuch part command is completely deprecated, so I don't think
\r
68 > there's really any reason to include a man page for it.
\r
70 I'm not sure if removing that would be "doing too many things at once";
\r
71 it is in the current man page. But maybe that was an oversight?
\r
73 > * There's no man page for restore (notmuch-restore.1).
\r
75 Currently the symlink to notmuch-dump.1.gz is installed at runtime. I
\r
76 agree this is a bit inconvenient for testing; I think it should work to
\r
77 have symlinks in the source just for the convenience of testers.
\r
79 > It also occurs to me while looking through this: do we really need a
\r
80 > separate "setup" command?
\r
82 I guess notmuch-setup is a UI convenience mainly for people who want to
\r
83 re-run setup. It doesn't feel as natural to me to run notmuch without
\r
84 arguments in this case. I couldn't really justify that, though.
\r
86 Thanks for the review,
\r