1 Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B6F431FAF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 00:07:05 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id ZQBdy8Fuv8PY for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Mon, 6 Feb 2012 00:07:05 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu
\r
19 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BCE4431FAE
\r
20 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 00:07:05 -0800 (PST)
\r
21 Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
22 by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA652E50D21;
\r
23 Mon, 6 Feb 2012 00:07:00 -0800 (PST)
\r
24 X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new
\r
25 Received: from finestructure.net (cpe-76-174-137-84.socal.res.rr.com
\r
26 [76.174.137.84]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins)
\r
27 by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E2782E50D30;
\r
28 Mon, 6 Feb 2012 00:06:57 -0800 (PST)
\r
29 Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
\r
30 id 4CB674CC; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 00:06:57 -0800 (PST)
\r
31 From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
32 To: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
33 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] emacs: Prefer '[No Subject]' to blank subjects.
\r
34 In-Reply-To: <cunvcnk4d45.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
\r
35 References: <1327496913-4946-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>
\r
36 <1327918561-16245-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>
\r
37 <1327918561-16245-3-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>
\r
38 <87sjiobfu1.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
39 <cunvcnk4d45.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
\r
40 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+156~gde94716 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
41 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
42 Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 00:06:54 -0800
\r
43 Message-ID: <87obtcbd29.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
45 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
\r
46 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
47 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
48 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
50 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
51 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
52 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
53 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
54 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
55 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
56 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
57 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
58 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
59 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:07:05 -0000
\r
62 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
64 On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:47:38 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:
\r
65 > On Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:07:02 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@fines=
\r
66 tructure.net> wrote:
\r
67 > > Sorry to be so late on this, but I'm not a big fan of this new feature.
\r
68 > > I would prefer to always see the subject (or any other field for that
\r
71 > The Emacs UI always replaced blank subjects with '[No Subject]' in
\r
72 > buffer names. The printing code also needed something other than a blank
\r
73 > subject for buffer renaming.
\r
75 I don't much care what the buffer name is. That seems to be a
\r
76 completely different issue to me.
\r
78 > Updating `notmuch-prettify-subject' to use a user configurable string
\r
79 > (that can be set to the empty string) sounds like a good idea. Please
\r
80 > ensure that the various other bits of code that require something other
\r
81 > than a blank subject still work properly.
\r
83 I am actually perfectly happy to see this patch reverted.
\r
88 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
\r
90 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
91 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
\r
93 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPL4oeAAoJEO00zqvie6q8ka0P/AguahtI7DY6FlsOIV6i1cPs
\r
94 6gEHPbtQVTARTJI7EedESFO/9mv1FqrqY/IUJHxAmrkp0GqDArrevF50F0i4ayT9
\r
95 v9y7LkC+HiU7CgbIBnIXSm+6+8ZOTovUGI9JpNhSjEy58iLZmPOGzevewleKB7uo
\r
96 9Tz1gvGNex2uWox+c0pgPE3HxiMNsqt2ScYhY6Fq0Mh2ALoFMx3PnPc6lrxanalT
\r
97 VJbp5mK6m2e46u3GcSRcfxQpWLX7w16tUueFnUiQxdC5tYR+V0t5d1MQeLSy89kz
\r
98 rJaXGLN79KlyU56MqyEjRT5COK7+oOt719MP3ECt7G+ICl3eJh5XL6UnME2NOWp8
\r
99 cWh3r2N1M8IkUXoZSoj3rlpDX+ID3iTPYhQMCboXbHIaqY53W5t2M4f6N5YjIIXJ
\r
100 lVoi0oZBdVqQMsbcblO4t+ugyLC9mEtl1n7J039P9eIDlHwVL+4vcNFELasfu2/q
\r
101 T0OnPpETji7Gw31QD2rQZdyTmoAdXnKmMvL81J5jmheSPkHfQA0+aKGDtw136hMe
\r
102 fh/R5YWP3AKlUDzefeIAHCMUioKIdJ1B7/c/CYrD68URIclPklYPHseWOVDwPnJg
\r
103 FRy1IU1AOb90NJL9LnWe9X+QQaQVjRC0EwopbKY9105SB6PP/sRZVZN976uzOW7L
\r
104 XytzmRl1MWBNAfrWPxCI
\r
106 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r