1 Return-Path: <anton@khirnov.net>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3783431FAF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 07:34:15 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id rGZDh+ZB8H4o for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Sun, 15 Jan 2012 07:34:15 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from smtp1.kolej.mff.cuni.cz (smtp1.kolej.mff.cuni.cz
\r
19 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5F71431FAE
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 07:34:14 -0800 (PST)
\r
23 X-Envelope-From: anton@khirnov.net
\r
24 Received: from daenerys.khirnov.net (zohar.kolej.mff.cuni.cz [78.128.198.199])
\r
25 by smtp1.kolej.mff.cuni.cz (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id
\r
26 q0FFY9Ku050210; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:34:12 +0100 (CET)
\r
27 (envelope-from anton@khirnov.net)
\r
28 Received: from daenerys.khirnov.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
29 by daenerys.khirnov.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB7212046A;
\r
30 Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:34:09 +0100 (CET)
\r
31 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
\r
33 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
34 User-Agent: notmuch-vimpy
\r
35 Message-ID: <20120115153408.30382.40507@daenerys.khirnov.net>
\r
36 Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:34:08 +0100
\r
37 References: <20120114075443.27927.39754@daenerys.khirnov.net>
\r
38 <87r4z1iudw.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
39 To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
40 In-Reply-To: <87r4z1iudw.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
41 From: Anton Khirnov <anton@khirnov.net>
\r
42 Subject: Re: [RFC] vim plugin rewrite II
\r
43 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
44 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
46 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
47 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
48 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
49 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
50 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
51 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
52 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
53 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
54 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
55 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 15:34:16 -0000
\r
58 On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 22:15:07 -0400, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:
\r
59 > On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 08:54:43 +0100, anton@khirnov.net wrote:
\r
62 > > The advantages over current vim client are still the following:
\r
63 > > * sending and displaying/saving attachments
\r
64 > > * much better unicode support
\r
65 > > * tag name and search commands completion
\r
66 > > * proper representation of the thread structure
\r
67 > > * easier to extend thanks to python's massive standard library
\r
76 > I'm not a vim user, so I probably can't say anything very helpful, but
\r
77 > it does sound like some nice improvements. Hopefully one of our vim
\r
78 > front-end users can comment a bit more. One thing I wondered about is
\r
79 > if your version is still completely synchronous, with the resulting
\r
80 > problems dealing with large (say, more than 10000 messages) search
\r
85 Yes, it's still synchronous. I suppose making it asynchronous shouldn't
\r
86 be all that hard, i just never found enough time and motivation for that
\r
87 (it was never a huge problem here).
\r