1 Return-Path: <cworth@cworth.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81153431FBF;
\r
6 Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:01:10 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
8 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
9 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
10 with ESMTP id 9ftBLCwcmVFv; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:01:09 -0800 (PST)
\r
11 Received: from cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
12 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51AE0431FAE;
\r
13 Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:01:09 -0800 (PST)
\r
14 From: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
\r
15 To: Adrian Perez de Castro <aperez@igalia.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
16 In-Reply-To: <20091123015339.79e51228@hikari>
\r
17 References: <1258762638-22905-1-git-send-email-aperez@igalia.com>
\r
18 <87r5rqks0m.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <20091123015339.79e51228@hikari>
\r
19 Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:00:55 +0100
\r
20 Message-ID: <87fx85g7i0.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
22 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
23 Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Support for printing file paths in new command
\r
24 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
25 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
\r
27 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
28 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
29 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
30 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
31 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
32 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
33 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
34 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
35 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
36 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:01:10 -0000
\r
38 On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:53:39 +0100, Adrian Perez de Castro <aperez@igalia.com> wrote:
\r
39 > IMHO it would be nice to have the messages-per-second information as
\r
40 > well in verbose mode before making it the default. I think I could cook
\r
41 > up a patch for that, but printing messages-per-second would mean calling
\r
42 > gettimeofday() for each processed file. Do you think that will be
\r
43 > acceptable from a performance POV? (Of course using silent mode would
\r
44 > still only call it once per second).
\r
46 Or how about using the existing timer to cause a rate to be printed
\r
47 between the message output once per second?
\r