1 Return-Path: <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB8B40B96F
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:10:15 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id zQ3UTS+SHTjL for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:10:05 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz (max.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.36])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3414196F2
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:10:05 -0700 (PDT)
\r
20 Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.200.4])
\r
21 by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8283E19F341C;
\r
22 Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:10:04 +0200 (CEST)
\r
23 X-Virus-Scanned: IMAP AMAVIS
\r
24 Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz ([192.168.200.1])
\r
25 by localhost (styx.feld.cvut.cz [192.168.200.4]) (amavisd-new,
\r
27 with ESMTP id R2a+ssDSm-3a; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:10:03 +0200 (CEST)
\r
28 Received: from imap.feld.cvut.cz (imap.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.34])
\r
29 by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 532AF19F3419;
\r
30 Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:10:03 +0200 (CEST)
\r
31 Received: from steelpick.2x.cz (k335-30.felk.cvut.cz [147.32.86.30])
\r
32 (Authenticated sender: sojkam1)
\r
33 by imap.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A35EFA004;
\r
34 Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:10:03 +0200 (CEST)
\r
35 Received: from wsh by steelpick.2x.cz with local (Exim 4.72)
\r
36 (envelope-from <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>)
\r
37 id 1OdobK-0000KU-LA; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:10:02 +0200
\r
38 From: Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
\r
39 To: eric casteleijn <thisfred@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
40 Subject: Re: Searching on arbitrary message headers
\r
41 In-Reply-To: <4C4EF9E9.2000801@gmail.com>
\r
42 References: <4C4EF9E9.2000801@gmail.com>
\r
43 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.3.1-80-g86b7c46 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1
\r
44 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
45 Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:10:02 +0200
\r
46 Message-ID: <87d3u8iyo5.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
\r
48 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
49 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
50 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
52 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
53 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
54 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
55 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
56 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
57 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
58 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
59 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
60 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
61 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:10:15 -0000
\r
63 On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, eric casteleijn wrote:
\r
64 > I realize that indexing the raw message is probably not a good idea,
\r
65 > since for instance the routing of a particular message is unlikely to be
\r
66 > of interest, but I was wondering if there is a way to specify additional
\r
67 > headers to be indexed by notmuch, or if not, if others would find this a
\r
68 > worthwhile addition?
\r
74 Add support for the user to specify custom headers to be indexed (and
\r
75 re-index these for existing messages at the next database upgrade).
\r
77 I think that Carl has plans to implement this feature for v0.4 together
\r
78 with other changes which require changing the database schema. But given
\r
79 the burstiness of notmuch development I can really say when that will
\r
80 happen. Of course, patches are welcomed :-)
\r