1 Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E27C431FAF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 04:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id RCZOqO5z2zwg for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Tue, 4 Jun 2013 04:37:23 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from tempo.its.unb.ca (tempo.its.unb.ca [131.202.1.21])
\r
18 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6C6A431FAE
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 04:37:23 -0700 (PDT)
\r
22 Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238])
\r
23 by tempo.its.unb.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r54BbBuA008524;
\r
24 Tue, 4 Jun 2013 08:37:11 -0300
\r
25 Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034082078.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net
\r
26 ([156.34.82.78] helo=zancas.localnet)
\r
27 by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa
\r
28 (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80)
\r
29 (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)
\r
30 id 1UjpY2-0001Nm-UW; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 08:37:11 -0300
\r
31 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.80)
\r
32 (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)
\r
33 id 1UjpXx-0005Un-5w; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 08:37:01 -0300
\r
34 From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
\r
35 To: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>
\r
36 Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: remove hardcoded defaults values from docstrings
\r
37 In-Reply-To: <m2ppw275hs.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
38 References: <1370181885-23021-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net>
\r
39 <20130604040102.GJ5999@mit.edu> <m2ppw275hs.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
40 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+141~gd298af4 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1
\r
41 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
42 Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 08:37:01 -0300
\r
43 Message-ID: <8738syrtsy.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
45 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
47 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
48 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
49 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
51 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
52 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
53 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
54 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
55 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
56 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
57 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
58 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
59 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
60 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 11:37:35 -0000
\r
62 Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> writes:
\r
64 > On Tue, Jun 04 2013, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU> wrote:
\r
66 >> I realize this already got pushed, but to me this seems like a
\r
67 >> reversion for the 95% of users who haven't customized
\r
68 >> notmuch-archive-tags and just want to know that archiving means
\r
69 >> removing the inbox tag. Why is this less confusing? Users who have
\r
70 >> customized notmuch-archive-tags will probably know that the "default"
\r
71 >> doesn't apply to them.
\r
73 As a side note, this kind of thing is why I started a texinfo manual; I
\r
74 don't really think reading docstrings is the best intro for a new user.
\r
76 > Can we have both -- i.e. something like (default: "-inbox") in the
\r
77 > docstring. When entering c-h f notmuch-show-archive-thread
\r
78 > The `notmuch-archive-tags' in text is a hyperlink to the documentation
\r
79 > of notmuch-archive-tags (which shows its current value)...
\r
81 I don't really mind Tomi's suggestion, although in practice I think
\r
82 following the hyperlink is also not so burdensome. I mainly didn't like
\r
83 the places it mentioned "inbox" without mentioning the variable that
\r