76/a47cf9f6d4073a16f99af6607c756928a352e1

   1 Return-Path: <five9a2@gmail.com>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07D4B431FBC\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  2 Dec 2009 06:51:58 -0800 (PST)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
   9         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  10         with ESMTP id eCE4LX3QVMu8 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  11         Wed,  2 Dec 2009 06:51:57 -0800 (PST)\r
  12 Received: from mail-bw0-f224.google.com (mail-bw0-f224.google.com\r
  13         [209.85.218.224])\r
  14         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A328C431FAE\r
  15         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  2 Dec 2009 06:51:57 -0800 (PST)\r
  16 Received: by bwz24 with SMTP id 24so240299bwz.30\r
  17         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:51:55 -0800 (PST)\r
  18 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
  19         h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:from:to:cc:subject\r
  20         :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;\r
  21         bh=yg8xfC+YVcmXQoLpq7HpFiOGH9m8nsRNF0j8DdzWA5c=;\r
  22         b=H/FY5ptbZWGhLd8HgpOmUdNAHgJ2jS4AZAjtNsohITyS98gUneLOQCbZmKw2uhIkvM\r
  23         zALGmjW5Z3Y2MHHHXeM+CVxUS46yLNmqJ58qzAVbC3j+a4RCXgJ87qAxMw5geyExQtDP\r
  24         DIU9evoJkjOomvPhY1KzfHH4+NtdMeTwv+V9g=\r
  25 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
  26         h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id\r
  27         :mime-version:content-type;\r
  28         b=qZslOD4cW3M9WKJncWeefQ/yWvBlfEPpLdg35+CIVchZgV3DAdgD0KOELg3/HL6Vfq\r
  29         N3/4QaG6a1zEeQ62O6sAJTjiaDw36i6Dr9Hm/pV7Y15rHKStiL0L4Yx+WcYJxC0o86Bp\r
  30         9jAHRDzteqK8IBWZxfVVNsa2i1Igccx50uWIM=\r
  31 Received: by 10.204.24.71 with SMTP id u7mr250071bkb.35.1259765515781;\r
  32         Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:51:55 -0800 (PST)\r
  33 Received: from kunyang (vawpc43.ethz.ch [129.132.59.11])\r
  34         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 26sm1518568fks.20.2009.12.02.06.51.54\r
  35         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);\r
  36         Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:51:54 -0800 (PST)\r
  37 Sender: Jed Brown <five9a2@gmail.com>\r
  38 From: Jed Brown <jed@59A2.org>\r
  39 To: Jan Janak <jan@ryngle.com>\r
  40 In-Reply-To: <20091202143854.GD4411@ryngle.com>\r
  41 References: <1258976966-22407-1-git-send-email-jed@59A2.org>\r
  42         <1258999643-30742-1-git-send-email-jed@59A2.org>\r
  43         <87bpii9j7o.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87vdgp4p5e.fsf@59A2.org>\r
  44         <20091202131808.GC4411@ryngle.com> <874oo9fq03.fsf@59A2.org>\r
  45         <20091202143854.GD4411@ryngle.com>\r
  46 Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:52:37 +0100\r
  47 Message-ID: <873a3tfmx6.fsf@59A2.org>\r
  48 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  49 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
  50 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  51 Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Make search filters handle disjunctive\r
  52  queries.\r
  53 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  54 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12\r
  55 Precedence: list\r
  56 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  57         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  58 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  59         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  60 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  61 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  62 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  63 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  64         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  65 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:51:58 -0000\r
  66 \r
  67 Jan, thanks for looking into this.\r
  68 \r
  69 On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 15:38:54 +0100, Jan Janak <jan@ryngle.com> wrote:\r
  70 > This seems close enough to what you want and maybe we could somehow make it\r
  71 > work with notmuch, too. This would be interesting to have, because then we\r
  72 > could complete multiple tag names with a single TAB press not only in your\r
  73 > expressions, but everywhere.\r
  74 \r
  75 Yes, I think that is desirable.\r
  76 \r
  77 > Let me know if you do not plan to work on this and I'll see if I can make it\r
  78 > work.\r
  79 \r
  80 I'm not using tags heavily at the moment, and am busy with other things\r
  81 so I'm unlikely to get to it in the next couple weeks.  If you can make\r
  82 completion work with this sort of input, I'll update my filter-by-tags\r
  83 patch.\r
  84 \r
  85 Jed\r